I was free fire before codm, and istg, it has many sexualized characters with a young audience, it was quite disgusting to be honest. Now, most of the characters actually look like they're operators and going to war.
Well yeah. They definitely had many beautiful operators & skins but almost none of them fall in the catagory of typical sexualization.
M_Bisonthe3rd
Some of the girl skins have some sexualization, but it isn’t gratuitous.
yayeeetchess
Urban tracker is easily the hottest female in the game no matter the outfit
Swimming-Comedian282
going to war? especially the unicorn and clown skins.
Betriz2
Manta Ray? Hello??
DesParado115
Finally, someone who’s talking about this. You’re partially correct however. Female characters original to CODM are still pretty sexualized but not too much like the others. Characters ported from the mainline cods however, are even less sexualized and that’s great.
Android1313
They are all very pretty, but they’re not exaggerated like comic book or manga characters when it comes to their bodies. I can definitely appreciate that as a guy. I am not a fan of things being too sexualized when it’s a game that has no reason to include it.
7 Comments
Well yeah. They definitely had many beautiful operators & skins but almost none of them fall in the catagory of typical sexualization.
Some of the girl skins have some sexualization, but it isn’t gratuitous.
Urban tracker is easily the hottest female in the game no matter the outfit
going to war? especially the unicorn and clown skins.
Manta Ray? Hello??
Finally, someone who’s talking about this. You’re partially correct however. Female characters original to CODM are still pretty sexualized but not too much like the others. Characters ported from the mainline cods however, are even less sexualized and that’s great.
They are all very pretty, but they’re not exaggerated like comic book or manga characters when it comes to their bodies. I can definitely appreciate that as a guy. I am not a fan of things being too sexualized when it’s a game that has no reason to include it.