Unreal Engine 5.6 vs Unreal Engine 5.4 Comparison – Significant Performance Improvement | RTX 5080

32 Comments

  1. Wait I thought people said that performance issues were the devs fault and there was nothing wrong with UE5.

  2. dwolfe127

    And look at that increased GPU wattage as well. Pretty significant.

  3. TecstasyDesigns

    More AI bullshit instead of optimizing games I’m sick of this slop.

  4. C137RickSanches

    Man there are no games in the market like this. 2 why is everything still? A large amount of the processing power will be all the cars and people moving about. I’ve never seen a hyper realistic game ever. Even with the current best graphics would not be able to handle something of this scale. I have a 5090, imo cyberpunk looks realistic but is still nowhere near this hyper realistic graphic. That’s on max 4k on pc oled gaming monitor, in ultra settings. There’s no way this will be available to the general public even in 10 years. How many of you can even afford a gpu around 3k to play this game at less than 10 frames per second? Screw that. I’ve been seeing these garbage hyper realistic videos of unreal engine claiming for about a decade now and still nothing.

  5. I’ll believe it when I tried it, before that I will stay sceptical af.

  6. What are my chances of this helping Rivals not destroy my CPU?

  7. Anyone else thing they are burning through the version numbers to quickly? We are gonna be on UE6 by the end of the year at this rate!

  8. Electric-Mountain

    Means nothing if the existing UE5 games don’t do an engine upgrade.

  9. Laddertoheaven

    Nice to see UE5 gaining performance. Now we wait for games to be built on that particular branch of UE5.

  10. tonihurri

    The improvement is nice but 70 fps out of a GPU that costs over a grand is ridiculous regardless.

  11. jezevec93

    I would like to see AMD card in that comparison also. For some reason 1% low are much worse on Nvidia currently. Would like to know whether this got fixed on Nvidia or whether both brands, Nvidia and AMD got equal boost in perf.

  12. Front-Win-5790

    significant? I can’t tell a difference between these two

  13. dumbledayum

    I would love to have a google maps fully rendered in UE

  14. reboot-your-computer

    It’s great and all but games built on prior versions probably won’t get updates to benefit from the performance advantages.

  15. This is cool and all but for gaming wouldn’t a moving scene be a far better representation? The cars aren’t moving and the people aren’t moving so could this level of graphics hold up in a real game scenario?

  16. Bloober team, please update your games to UE 5.6, thanks!

  17. GoodVibes900

    INDEED! UE 5.6 is a legit step up. On an RTX 5080, you’re looking at around **25% better GPU performance** and up to **35% faster CPU handling** compared to 5.4. Lumen runs smoother, ray tracing is sharper, and the new fast geometry streaming makes big scenes way less choppy. If you’re doing anything CPU-bound or ray-traced, it’s a no-brainer upgrade.

  18. marniconuke

    wow yeah just what i want, to buy a 5080 only to use advanced ai techniques to get good performance

  19. Is it just me or does it not look that good? Just looks like a PS4 game

  20. I’m convinced that the better the engines and gpus get then it mostly just means developers do less work to optimize. 

  21. Individual-Donkey-92

    Offtopic: I would love to see a modern game set in Paris. I am a bit tired of plethora of games set in US cities. Paris would be a nice change

  22. Very cool demo. Btw does anyone else feel like shadows are all over the place in this demo? Like should be stronger in some places, smaller in others, or just completely missing sometimes?

Write A Comment