I wonder what all the idiots who cry “DA FAKE FRAMES!!!” will say now that AMD is doing it and it’s no longer an nvidia-only thing…
ash549k
Fsr frame gen was always decent though, I used to use it even on my old 2060 super but still frame gen needs at least 60 fps to feel decent
ziplock9000
It was always decent and had support for games at the driver level before NV.
This-Astronaut246
FSR 3 has been working very well for me already. Much smoother gameplay and looks good. Except when I play a UE5 game, of course.
Homewra
So far the best results i get are from Lossless scaling, capping the framerate to 45 then multiplying it by 4.
180FPS for my 180Hz monitor, feels smooth AF.
kukisRedditer
Would be even better if games actually supported fsr4. Without optiscaler like nvidia….
_regionrat
Sweet, now I can get 12,000 FPS on Sims 3
IsoLasti
Suddenly fake frames aren’t so fake after all when AMD does it huh PCMR
lexcyn
Shame they haven’t backported this to older cards… I understand there are hardware differences but you’d think they could port some features back.
Vivorio
I don’t know why saying that, it was always decent to me.
Dat_Boi_John
“decent frame gen”
Wtf does that mean lol, FSR 3 frame gen was better than DLSS 3 frame gen because it actually gave a substantially larger fps boost due to it’s lower overhead, while the visual difference was unnoticeable without slowing the game down and looking at individual frames.
DLSS frame gen only caught up with their DLSS 4 frame generation which decreased the overhead to be closer to FSR 3 FG’s overhead.
iceixia
woah hang on I thought ‘fake frames’ were bad?
Or is it only when Nvidia does it?
zolikk
I’d rather have decently optimized games that do not require frame gen to reach the advertised performance, but oh well I guess it’s not nothing…
Joljom
Even better than already decent FSR 3 FG? Awesome, can’t wait
Makoto_Kurume
I have i5 10400F & RX 7600. If my PC can run games at 1080p 60fps, which I’m happy with, then I should just turn off any upscaling such as FSR or any frame gen, right? I should just play on native res, or am I missing something?
Guilty-Influence-890
As a 7000 series GPU owner I’m so annoyed. Don’t AMD and Nvidia still support their older cards for a bit even after a new generation comes out? AMD is flat out ignoring 7000 series and older. Give us FSR 4 or similar
Vel250
Would this improve Ray tracing in titles without in game upscaling such as Elden ring?
Consistent_Cat3451
Frame gen is Still NOT at a good point, FSR4 made huge improvements when it comes to upscalling so there’s hope
Cryio
FSR 3.1 FG is outstanding AND better than DLSS4 FG. The title is clickbait.
Prefix-NA
Fsr frame gen was far superior to dlss 3 FG then Nvidia came with dlss 4.0 FG which fixed the performance issues that ruined FG and dlss 4 FG > fsr 3.1 FG
Dlss 4 and fsr 4 are so far above 3.0 on everything it’s like the 3.0 are unusable in comparison
jackoneill1984
I use FSR framegen on my 3080. Never noticed any weird issues. Though I am usually using Native Res or DLSS if the option is available. Have used FSR3 and it looked fine. Not pixel peeping though, just enjoying the story.
HarryTurney
So does this subreddit suddenly like frame gen now that AMD is doing it?
ChinaTiananmen
Nobody cares about fake frame gen
misiek685250
So now “fake frames” are good because midamd has it xD?
LBXZero
We care about frame generation?
Cave_TP
Ok. Anyway
rawzombie26
LSFG is already fire, AMD and Nvidia are on track to be surpassed by a community project.
BluePhoenix21
Although it would be nice to have on RDNA3, I still firmly believe frame gen is a trash technology. It only really does anything if you already have a high frame rate.
28 Comments
I wonder what all the idiots who cry “DA FAKE FRAMES!!!” will say now that AMD is doing it and it’s no longer an nvidia-only thing…
Fsr frame gen was always decent though, I used to use it even on my old 2060 super but still frame gen needs at least 60 fps to feel decent
It was always decent and had support for games at the driver level before NV.
FSR 3 has been working very well for me already. Much smoother gameplay and looks good. Except when I play a UE5 game, of course.
So far the best results i get are from Lossless scaling, capping the framerate to 45 then multiplying it by 4.
180FPS for my 180Hz monitor, feels smooth AF.
Would be even better if games actually supported fsr4. Without optiscaler like nvidia….
Sweet, now I can get 12,000 FPS on Sims 3
Suddenly fake frames aren’t so fake after all when AMD does it huh PCMR
Shame they haven’t backported this to older cards… I understand there are hardware differences but you’d think they could port some features back.
I don’t know why saying that, it was always decent to me.
“decent frame gen”
Wtf does that mean lol, FSR 3 frame gen was better than DLSS 3 frame gen because it actually gave a substantially larger fps boost due to it’s lower overhead, while the visual difference was unnoticeable without slowing the game down and looking at individual frames.
DLSS frame gen only caught up with their DLSS 4 frame generation which decreased the overhead to be closer to FSR 3 FG’s overhead.
woah hang on I thought ‘fake frames’ were bad?
Or is it only when Nvidia does it?
I’d rather have decently optimized games that do not require frame gen to reach the advertised performance, but oh well I guess it’s not nothing…
Even better than already decent FSR 3 FG? Awesome, can’t wait
I have i5 10400F & RX 7600. If my PC can run games at 1080p 60fps, which I’m happy with, then I should just turn off any upscaling such as FSR or any frame gen, right? I should just play on native res, or am I missing something?
As a 7000 series GPU owner I’m so annoyed. Don’t AMD and Nvidia still support their older cards for a bit even after a new generation comes out? AMD is flat out ignoring 7000 series and older. Give us FSR 4 or similar
Would this improve Ray tracing in titles without in game upscaling such as Elden ring?
Frame gen is Still NOT at a good point, FSR4 made huge improvements when it comes to upscalling so there’s hope
FSR 3.1 FG is outstanding AND better than DLSS4 FG. The title is clickbait.
Fsr frame gen was far superior to dlss 3 FG then Nvidia came with dlss 4.0 FG which fixed the performance issues that ruined FG and dlss 4 FG > fsr 3.1 FG
Dlss 4 and fsr 4 are so far above 3.0 on everything it’s like the 3.0 are unusable in comparison
I use FSR framegen on my 3080. Never noticed any weird issues. Though I am usually using Native Res or DLSS if the option is available. Have used FSR3 and it looked fine. Not pixel peeping though, just enjoying the story.
So does this subreddit suddenly like frame gen now that AMD is doing it?
Nobody cares about fake frame gen
So now “fake frames” are good because midamd has it xD?
We care about frame generation?
Ok. Anyway
LSFG is already fire, AMD and Nvidia are on track to be surpassed by a community project.
Although it would be nice to have on RDNA3, I still firmly believe frame gen is a trash technology. It only really does anything if you already have a high frame rate.