I haven’t paid too much attention but I saw people with 4090s having issues at 1440p. Granted I’m waiting for ultra wide support so i can’t test myself but if it is having issues with a 4090 that kinda sucks no?
ARTISTIC-ASSHOLE
I’ve got a 4060, what are my chances at 4K?
Ok_Switch_1205
Eh. Looks good, but also blurry
Statchero
I don’t know guys looks pretty good on my Series S. Just kidding will definitely be picking up on steam this Monday to put the 4080 to work
Restivethought
I have DLSS set to dynamic and Im doing 4k on my 3080TI. There’s a few drops under 60 but not anything that interferes with gameplay.
GlowDonk9054
it’d prolly look as nice even on lower settings
GrapeDrainkBby
It still baffles me how Red Dead 2 run amazing on so called low end, and even Ragnarok will run fine, then bam, a game that just can’t, you’re telling me, there’s no way space marine 2 can run at 1650 resolution with variable settings at say 45 fps?
ThisDumbApp
To be fair, my system barely can run it above 60 on low so like, can use a little optimisation lol
R-Chicken
Me running a 3820 and a 1080ti just enjoying it when I can lol
ziplock9000
Nobody is saying this though
halisdeiru
PC gamers when a pc port is terrible as always and they try to rationalize it with system req’s.
Exsangwyn
I’m impressed it’s on visual mode and not chugging on ps5. At least in level 2
CarlWellsGrave
People on this sub think that a 1080ti should be able to run all new games at native 4K 60 and when they don’t they cry that the game isn’t optimized.
WazTheWaz
Game is mid in terms of gameplay, but man it does look great at 1600p on a 4080. Can run it natively without DLSS too.
skyman5150
This is the first game my 4090 cant run at 120 fps at 4k even with dlss besides WH3. Which is definitely a game issue since the game never goes above using 70% of my GPU or 50% of my cpu.
TheBoobSpecialist
For a game that costs like $200 here you better make sure to have a $3500 PC for it.
18 Comments
Might as well sell the rig and get a new gen console
Last time I saw GTX 1060 and 1440p 60 FPS in same sentence was 2017.
https://i.redd.it/zbpubrn5j8nd1.gif
I haven’t paid too much attention but I saw people with 4090s having issues at 1440p. Granted I’m waiting for ultra wide support so i can’t test myself but if it is having issues with a 4090 that kinda sucks no?
I’ve got a 4060, what are my chances at 4K?
Eh. Looks good, but also blurry
I don’t know guys looks pretty good on my Series S. Just kidding will definitely be picking up on steam this Monday to put the 4080 to work
I have DLSS set to dynamic and Im doing 4k on my 3080TI. There’s a few drops under 60 but not anything that interferes with gameplay.
it’d prolly look as nice even on lower settings
It still baffles me how Red Dead 2 run amazing on so called low end, and even Ragnarok will run fine, then bam, a game that just can’t, you’re telling me, there’s no way space marine 2 can run at 1650 resolution with variable settings at say 45 fps?
To be fair, my system barely can run it above 60 on low so like, can use a little optimisation lol
Me running a 3820 and a 1080ti just enjoying it when I can lol
Nobody is saying this though
PC gamers when a pc port is terrible as always and they try to rationalize it with system req’s.
I’m impressed it’s on visual mode and not chugging on ps5. At least in level 2
People on this sub think that a 1080ti should be able to run all new games at native 4K 60 and when they don’t they cry that the game isn’t optimized.
Game is mid in terms of gameplay, but man it does look great at 1600p on a 4080. Can run it natively without DLSS too.
This is the first game my 4090 cant run at 120 fps at 4k even with dlss besides WH3. Which is definitely a game issue since the game never goes above using 70% of my GPU or 50% of my cpu.
For a game that costs like $200 here you better make sure to have a $3500 PC for it.