What was wrong with the current naming scheme intel
4Arrow
Good luck selling these to the disappointed customers who bought 13/14 gen chips.
NOS4NANOL1FE
Horrible sku names. God damn
Pretend-Newspaper-86
ultra = REALLY FAST
WetAndLoose
People are gonna think this is like some unknown 2nd gen chip lmao
From-UoM
The naming makes perfect sense
U7 265K
U7 is like i7 which I believe stood for Intel
The first number after is the Generation. This is the 2nd gen. This is the 2nd gen Tile based intel CPU
Second number is class and third number is subclass.
K means unlocked like always.
In the old scheme it would be called i7 15650k (15th gen)
Jackedman123
I just figure out the intel naming scheme.. god damn it!
TxM_2404
“So I got an Ultra 5 345”
“You mean i5 3450?”
ResponsibleTruck4717
No idea why the change in naming scheme, but I won’t touch any new chip from Intel for at least 2 generations.
JukaiKotan
This confusing naming schemes need to stop. AMD did it (Ryzen AI HX 370 or whatever that called) , Qualcomm, Intel did these too.
Out of all big tech companies. I really hate to admit it, but only Apple do the naming scheme right? M1, M2, etc.
alphagusta
I think they really should have tried to make the IHS a squre again, or if they changed the ILM to not flex it so bad thats fine I guess
Ubelsteiner
Cool, I’ll pass! It’ll take multiple generations of solid reliability before I even consider doing any more Intel builds.
These-Midnight-1620
Intel just acting like their last gen CPU never existed lol. Their CPU totally screwed my build with it’s insane instability. Personally, I’m never buying intel again for how they ‘addressed’ the issue
Catch_022
My 4770 becomes relevant again!
locoghoul
Who cares they are dead to me, next build is def AMD
soggybiscuit93
They replaced 14600K, 14700K, and 14900K with 245K, 265K, and 285K. How will I ever learn these confusing names? Next you’ll tell me that next year’s models are gonna be called 345K, 365K, and 385K? Insanity!
/s
JediGRONDmaster
Umm what. I legit don’t know what performance class these are supposed to be
unlucky_ducky
How much oxidation does it come with?
Games_sans_frontiers
Marketing men: We’re getting a lot of bad press! Prepare the leaks!
TheOwl27
nice try INTC stock, Grandma still watching
svenger-hunter-gomez
so is this basically the 15900k or is this something else?
SomeMeatBag
Think I’ll try ryzen next lol
dfv157
Soo, intel reputation aside, this doesn’t look that good.
The P core on the “i7” has lower performance than the 9700X ST scores, and the P core on the “i5” is the basically the same as the 7700X? That means the only thing that’s allowing the MT scores to push higher (and thus look better in benchmarks) is the E cores?
EliRed
No thanks. Finally ready to upgrade from my 4790k when then zen5 x3d comes out.
24 Comments
What was wrong with the current naming scheme intel
Good luck selling these to the disappointed customers who bought 13/14 gen chips.
Horrible sku names. God damn
ultra = REALLY FAST
People are gonna think this is like some unknown 2nd gen chip lmao
The naming makes perfect sense
U7 265K
U7 is like i7 which I believe stood for Intel
The first number after is the Generation. This is the 2nd gen. This is the 2nd gen Tile based intel CPU
Second number is class and third number is subclass.
K means unlocked like always.
In the old scheme it would be called i7 15650k (15th gen)
I just figure out the intel naming scheme.. god damn it!
“So I got an Ultra 5 345”
“You mean i5 3450?”
No idea why the change in naming scheme, but I won’t touch any new chip from Intel for at least 2 generations.
This confusing naming schemes need to stop. AMD did it (Ryzen AI HX 370 or whatever that called) , Qualcomm, Intel did these too.
Out of all big tech companies. I really hate to admit it, but only Apple do the naming scheme right? M1, M2, etc.
I think they really should have tried to make the IHS a squre again, or if they changed the ILM to not flex it so bad thats fine I guess
Cool, I’ll pass! It’ll take multiple generations of solid reliability before I even consider doing any more Intel builds.
Intel just acting like their last gen CPU never existed lol. Their CPU totally screwed my build with it’s insane instability. Personally, I’m never buying intel again for how they ‘addressed’ the issue
My 4770 becomes relevant again!
Who cares they are dead to me, next build is def AMD
They replaced 14600K, 14700K, and 14900K with 245K, 265K, and 285K. How will I ever learn these confusing names? Next you’ll tell me that next year’s models are gonna be called 345K, 365K, and 385K? Insanity!
/s
Umm what. I legit don’t know what performance class these are supposed to be
How much oxidation does it come with?
Marketing men: We’re getting a lot of bad press! Prepare the leaks!
nice try INTC stock, Grandma still watching
so is this basically the 15900k or is this something else?
Think I’ll try ryzen next lol
Soo, intel reputation aside, this doesn’t look that good.
The P core on the “i7” has lower performance than the 9700X ST scores, and the P core on the “i5” is the basically the same as the 7700X? That means the only thing that’s allowing the MT scores to push higher (and thus look better in benchmarks) is the E cores?
No thanks. Finally ready to upgrade from my 4790k when then zen5 x3d comes out.