Using this as my source:
https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-9000-zen-5-cpus-up-to-6400-8000-mtps-4-dimm-ddr5-memory-run-cooler-lower-power-by-default/amp/
So the new zen 5 ram speed questions arise. 6400mt/s at 1:1 ? 9000 mt/s at 1:2 with 2 DIMMS?
Assuming I wanted the “fastest” ram at 2x32gb, which would be better. What even is the difference?

2 Comments

  1. AmputatorBot

    It looks like OP posted an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot).

    Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-9000-zen-5-cpus-up-to-6400-8000-mtps-4-dimm-ddr5-memory-run-cooler-lower-power-by-default/](https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-9000-zen-5-cpus-up-to-6400-8000-mtps-4-dimm-ddr5-memory-run-cooler-lower-power-by-default/)**

    *****

    ^(I’m a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)

  2. Obvious_Drive_1506

    6400 mclk uclk yes. That’s already possible with Ryzen 7000. You’d be better off trying 6600 to start

Write A Comment