30 hours is still a long time for a single player game and frankly most of the games that have 50+ hours are padded to hell
Most people don’t even finish games in the first place.. 30 hours is plenty
Affectionate-Cry3349
Do they mean they still need 30 hours to finish making it
estofaulty
Already been posted.
estofaulty
InB4 an influx of comments about how this game has the gall to have a premium edition just like every other triple A game in existence.
Bobelando
activision: hahaha take my 5 hour campaign, eat it and die!
Empuda
Sounds like a challenge. Who will be the first to beat it in 29 hours!?
[deleted]
That’s not terrible. Getting 100% will add some hours, so it’s a good game length. Thought it would be way longer, though.
Zetra3
Cool, I’m not interested in blitzing story
MammothNose827
How do they make these estimates? Honest question
OHeiland
Doesn’t say much.. you can finish stellar blade in like 8 hours, but I did all sidequests etc and had 38 hours of fun
All-Cesco
Knew this game sounded too good to be true. 🤣
obsoleteconsole
Speedrunners: And I took that personally
NIDORAX
A good game should last a minimum of 8 Hours on any playthrough. If the game is short, then it better have a high replayability value.
A Star Wars open galaxy game should have enough content and story to keep you playing. 30 hours of gameplay content is acceptable
charlesbronZon
So what…
If playtime is the thing we demand, it’s gonna be playtime we get… empty content specifically designed to artificially stretch playtime without any value to it!
ShiroFoxya
A good singleplayer game should have 50 hours minimum, 100h for 100% would be good too
LimpBizkitEnjoyer_
It will feel A LOT longer tho due to cringy gen-z dialogue
SamCraftRecon
It’s a good length. Yeah. But the fact that the most expensive version has a mission locked to it, and costs €140 💀…
Honestly don’t know if I want to get the game or not. What do you all think? Does it look like it will be good?
Llamatronicon
For reference, thats about the same estimated playtime of each installation in the Mass Effect series. Seems perfectly reasonable for a singe player experience.
gitg0od
that’s too short for my liking.
we’re going to get more and more shorter game still at full price because of all the whiners all over the web crying because “for them” games are too long and they dont have time to play them…
video games specially solo games are not a race, it’s not a competition, if games are really long i’ll just take it you longer to finish it they’re nothing wrong with it.
RhinoxMenace
very interesting – unfortunately, i don’t waste my time on Ubishit games
22 Comments
I will be done with it in 0 seconds!
[deleted]
30 hours is still a long time for a single player game and frankly most of the games that have 50+ hours are padded to hell
Most people don’t even finish games in the first place.. 30 hours is plenty
Do they mean they still need 30 hours to finish making it
Already been posted.
InB4 an influx of comments about how this game has the gall to have a premium edition just like every other triple A game in existence.
activision: hahaha take my 5 hour campaign, eat it and die!
Sounds like a challenge. Who will be the first to beat it in 29 hours!?
That’s not terrible. Getting 100% will add some hours, so it’s a good game length. Thought it would be way longer, though.
Cool, I’m not interested in blitzing story
How do they make these estimates? Honest question
Doesn’t say much.. you can finish stellar blade in like 8 hours, but I did all sidequests etc and had 38 hours of fun
Knew this game sounded too good to be true. 🤣
Speedrunners: And I took that personally
A good game should last a minimum of 8 Hours on any playthrough. If the game is short, then it better have a high replayability value.
A Star Wars open galaxy game should have enough content and story to keep you playing. 30 hours of gameplay content is acceptable
So what…
If playtime is the thing we demand, it’s gonna be playtime we get… empty content specifically designed to artificially stretch playtime without any value to it!
A good singleplayer game should have 50 hours minimum, 100h for 100% would be good too
It will feel A LOT longer tho due to cringy gen-z dialogue
It’s a good length. Yeah. But the fact that the most expensive version has a mission locked to it, and costs €140 💀…
Honestly don’t know if I want to get the game or not. What do you all think? Does it look like it will be good?
For reference, thats about the same estimated playtime of each installation in the Mass Effect series. Seems perfectly reasonable for a singe player experience.
that’s too short for my liking.
we’re going to get more and more shorter game still at full price because of all the whiners all over the web crying because “for them” games are too long and they dont have time to play them…
video games specially solo games are not a race, it’s not a competition, if games are really long i’ll just take it you longer to finish it they’re nothing wrong with it.
very interesting – unfortunately, i don’t waste my time on Ubishit games