6800XT/3070TI and R7 5700X3D/i5 12600K for 60 fps at 1080? What do you think of this?
6800XT/3070TI and R7 5700X3D/i5 12600K for 60 fps at 1080? What do you think of this?
49 Comments
5800X3D* damn, noticed right as I clicked post
This game better be the most cutting edge game of all time if that’s what you need for just 1080p. Just looking at the assets in the post, game is more likely than not unoptimized as hell
Unoptimized garbage. It really doesn’t seem like the game is doing anything super advanced technologically to justify this based on the early gameplay vids.
They better prepare themselves for some serious backlash
Unoptimized piece of shit.
Oh well, graphics like from the Heroes of Might and Magic series yet you need cutting edge machine, lol.
5800x3d and 3070ti can only do 1080p/quality? lolololol. WTF is this trash. Game looks good but not if it will run this shit.
Finally I can put my rig up to the test! 1080p 60fps baby!
I know nothing about the game but why are people ranting about early access specs? I mean if it’s early access it can’t be optimised I would assume.
I don’t do Early Access, it doesn’t matter how much I want a game, as far as I’m concerned it doesn’t exist until 1.0
Hopefully by full release it will be much better optimised
That’s pretty insane, to be honest. The minimum requirements are actually pretty reasonable considering the GTX 970 is a 10 year old GPU, and the 8400/2600 are also plenty old.
But a 6800xt for fucking 1080p/60? That’s bonkers, the 6800xt is a monster 1440p card and even does decently in entry level 4k… this game better either look better than real life or it’s just not optimized at all.
A Dev already came out and addressed some build [specs](https://steamcommunity.com/app/1371980/discussions/0/4369129947729103641/), apparently it still runs like mud. lovely art style though.
That seems crazy for an isometric game to be that demanding. Guess we’ll see, but that’s gonna get them a ton of negative press if its not fixed before the game goes full release.
a 3070ti for 1080p@60fps? That’s kinda steep for a game like that isn’t it?
My poor, overpriced 3060ti
Well that’s “overwhelmingly negative” on Steam on day 1 material, same as DD2. And deserved.
requirements are getting ridiculous wtf. also why is rx 6800 xt on the same level as 3070ti, according to this list? i’m pretty sure rx 6800 xt is more equivalent to a 3080(ti), no? and isn’t the 5800x3d also quite a bit more powerful than 12600k?
A 5800x3d plus 6800xt or a 3070ti for freaking 1080p 60???????? Yikes 😬
Why do all arpgs have shit optimization?
Tf they smoking over there at Moon Studios
Another flop that will be forgotten
foot-encoded. Keep my 3900X & 6600XT for long
There is a massive power gap between the minimum and recommended. I don’t know much about this game, but the recommended specs would run forbidden west at 1440 with 60+, cant imagine this being that much more intensive.
Have you seen the Ghost of Tsushima requirements?
wtf these are unacceptably high
Is it good? No.
Is it Early Access? Yes
Did they provide more info? https://twitter.com/TheGennadiy/status/1780645240996536769
Am I playing stable 60 fps with a 5600x+3060ti on quality 2k? Still yes.
The Vega 56 is comparable to a 1070 so that’s odd the 970 is listed.
There’s something weird going on here, like, I can see the 3070ti as the recommended GPU for 1080p/60fps on next-gen demanding games, but, why is the 6800xt put with it? the 6800xt is about 20% faster than the 3070ti.
It’s like if the recommended specs for something said “fpr 60fps 1080p, we recommend a 3050 or a 3060ti” like. there’s a massive performance gap between those two cards, why would they *both* be recommended for the same average performance rating.
Best I can gather is maybe a 3070ti with DLSS? but typically they clarify if the pc spec recommendation is using upscaling, but even then, with DLSS the 3070ti still doesn’t come close to the 6800xt.
That’s a pretty big jump between minimum and recommended
This is probably the biggest jump I’ve seen from minimum to recommended, so much so, that it doesn’t make sense for 1080p unless they are using a completely different rendering technique for the recommended settings.
I just saw DF cover this game too. It seems like an isometric 3D action game that doesn’t even look that impressive.
78483rd game gets released unoptimised. This sub:
I mean the reactions are downright comical at this point. “Why us? And why now? Whyyyy aggaaaaiiiin????”
Bullshit that game should run fine on a gtx 1650 at 1080p
Bullshit
Honestly companies are *terrible* at figuring out their system requirements, I would take this with a mountain of salt and just try it for yourself and refund if needed.
Guess I’ll play Manor Lords instead
wtf, game that has cartoonish/painted graphical design and where you fight like max 3 opponents at the same time in a top down style of action gets this bad performance?
W
T
F
?
?
?
Minimum requirements seems Ok but why the F it needs 3070ti for 1080p 60fps? lol
Based on video, graphics didn’t improve very much, so the low end PC can handle it to
starfield is that you?
even star citizen gets you more fps lol
Guys it’s in Early Access there is zeto optimization so thats why such a high requirement.
Minimum means im playing in stop motion? With the recommended that high, why such a disparity?
Not going to lie the game looks beautiful…. but…. for a non multiplayer game and with only a certain viewport 2.5D camera it should be near double those numbers.
Great another game that will be finished and optimized in 2 years when I can buy it for 50% off
I mean I think it’s better too over shoot then undershoot. But I’m sure as early access goes on the specs should hopefully improve too.
Game is trash gameplay wise. As for performance I’ve seen streamers with 14900K/4090 dipping under 60 fps.
It’s early access, so it hasn’t been optimised yet
Go watch Digital Foundry’s preview of this game, this is not quite accurate; it is also in early access and things like DLSS have not been added yet