This is very true!

16 Comments

  1. introspectivebrownie

    But the image over the next 5 seconds will prove vastly different ๐Ÿ™‚

  2. WeirdestOfWeirdos

    ๐Ÿค“Well ackchually, though GTA V (pictured) does not use them, temporal image treatment technologies like DLSS2 or TSR are more prone to minor artifacts at lower framerates

  3. If you have a screen of 0 hz and your game is at 30 or 60 fps, you will still see 0 fps so the switch is technically as smooth as a 5k pc with that sort of screen

  4. Not4Fame

    I beg to differ, they are not the same, one says 60fps. Train goes faster in 60fps.Trains in my country may go as high as 75fps. C’mon now.

  5. Zanas_Slave

    so you are telling me that the guy in tech store sold me screen that can do 144hz with extended warranty instead of me just buying 60hz cheaper one? D:

  6. SorryIdonthaveaname

    but the monitor companies told me that lower fps = blurry image ๐Ÿ™

  7. The images are clearly shot from a different angle! This is cheating!

  8. Hugejorma

    ![gif](giphy|lowAWCxGXbl5vVlrWH|downsized)

  9. ChosenOfTheMoon_GR

    Looking at still photos is zero FPS either way, check mate.

  10. MrRzepa2

    Typical comparison shots from monitor or GPU blurb. My favourite have to be monitor response times.

  11. First-Junket124

    Get rid of the text in the image, show one at 100 FPS and another at 200 FPS and I guarantee you only 50% will get it right

Write A Comment