Probably Hearts of Stone, but they’re all 10/10 for me. In general, I feel that CDPR are at their best when they’re allowed to focus on a narrower, more constrained story line.
1DarthMario
Blood and wine. The expansion is so good and gives so much content that it would have been sold as a new game if ubisoft was the developer instead.
DiceCubed1460
Blood and Wine.
It’s basically The Witcher 3.5. It added so much new shit to do! And it’s so damn good!
Plus it has my favorite game map of any game ever. It’s beyond beautiful while still being terrifying in some ways. The turquoise sky over the sun-warmed lands just looks stunning. Plus all the mountains in the distance give it a very serene and glorious feeling. Combining that with the lurking threat of vampires and monsters around every corner gives the world a unique feeling unlike anything else in gaming.
DreamsofValinor
Blood and Wine would be my favourite. That being said, I have enjoyed all of the expansions from CD Projekt Red.
kpe_ee1
for me personally, it’s phantom liberty. blood and wine is probably more expansive and acts more like an epilogue but phantom liberty i think matches it with an extremely well written and impactful story, moreso than blood and wine. Phantom Liberty feels like Heart of Stone’s story brilliance mixed with Blood and Wine’s new map and it works extremely well.
that being said, all three of them are 10/10.
vilgefcrtz
Phantom Liberty has the best plot, but Blood and Wine has the best gameplay flow – all in my humble opinion. For some reason The Witcher feels a lot better when doing secondary missions and small tasks, CP2077 has a feeling of urgency and suspense that really takes away from the exploration factor in benefit to the main story.
tetrapods
Me too. Easy to see actually
Futurenobodyrojo
Phantom Liberty, but maybe that’s because I’m a bigger fan of the cyberpunk genre in general than I am of medieval fantasy.
No_Sound_2264
Blood and wine
LirHen
trying to decide which one I think is better and I got a nosebleed, I love them all
jeancv8
All three are 10/10. They even put some full games to shame *cough* Starfield *cough*.
xiDeliriouSx
Blood and wine>>>>>>>>>heart of stone>>>>>>>turd>>>>>>Phantom Liberty
bcartwright95
HoS > BaW > PL
pedrojdm2021
I have the goty edition of TW3 , but i havent touched the dlc’s yet
RTX3090TI
Blood and wines at least Geralt gets a happy ending
Zuitsdg
Blood and wine felt like a new game 😀
B&W > PL > HoS imo
16 Comments
Probably Hearts of Stone, but they’re all 10/10 for me. In general, I feel that CDPR are at their best when they’re allowed to focus on a narrower, more constrained story line.
Blood and wine. The expansion is so good and gives so much content that it would have been sold as a new game if ubisoft was the developer instead.
Blood and Wine.
It’s basically The Witcher 3.5. It added so much new shit to do! And it’s so damn good!
Plus it has my favorite game map of any game ever. It’s beyond beautiful while still being terrifying in some ways. The turquoise sky over the sun-warmed lands just looks stunning. Plus all the mountains in the distance give it a very serene and glorious feeling. Combining that with the lurking threat of vampires and monsters around every corner gives the world a unique feeling unlike anything else in gaming.
Blood and Wine would be my favourite. That being said, I have enjoyed all of the expansions from CD Projekt Red.
for me personally, it’s phantom liberty. blood and wine is probably more expansive and acts more like an epilogue but phantom liberty i think matches it with an extremely well written and impactful story, moreso than blood and wine. Phantom Liberty feels like Heart of Stone’s story brilliance mixed with Blood and Wine’s new map and it works extremely well.
that being said, all three of them are 10/10.
Phantom Liberty has the best plot, but Blood and Wine has the best gameplay flow – all in my humble opinion. For some reason The Witcher feels a lot better when doing secondary missions and small tasks, CP2077 has a feeling of urgency and suspense that really takes away from the exploration factor in benefit to the main story.
Me too. Easy to see actually
Phantom Liberty, but maybe that’s because I’m a bigger fan of the cyberpunk genre in general than I am of medieval fantasy.
Blood and wine
trying to decide which one I think is better and I got a nosebleed, I love them all
All three are 10/10. They even put some full games to shame *cough* Starfield *cough*.
Blood and wine>>>>>>>>>heart of stone>>>>>>>turd>>>>>>Phantom Liberty
HoS > BaW > PL
I have the goty edition of TW3 , but i havent touched the dlc’s yet
Blood and wines at least Geralt gets a happy ending
Blood and wine felt like a new game 😀
B&W > PL > HoS imo