Let’s open a champagne πŸ₯‚ what a comeback

17 Comments

  1. PastStep1232

    8/10 is about what I’d give to CP2077. Great graphics, great actor performance, great animations, but barely an rpg.

  2. BlueKud006

    And it only took CDPR 3 years and multiple lawsuits around the world to reach an 8, clap clap clap.

  3. sonofpenelope

    Nobody cares about Steam reviews.

    Anyone wanting to celebrate the β€˜success’ of user reviews that wasn’t involved in the development of the game is someone who takes credit for spending money.

    Less than 700k total reviews. Do they publish how many units they’ve moved? It be nice to see how relevant this number actually is. 700k/1 million Huge. 700k of 10 million not so much.

  4. barbor92r

    After playing Cyberpunk 2077 (Patch 2.0), I would give it an 8/10, so Steam’s average seems OK to me. Cyberpunk is just a good game.

  5. Zestyclose-Fee6719

    Personally, for its themes and characters above all else, I consider it a technically flawed masterpiece. I’m fine with people not necessarily agreeing.

  6. I waited until now to start playing. Literally did the corpo intro and stopped when arriving at the apartment when they announced 2.1.

    So glad I waited. Admit it guys. CD Projekt Red is back. And their next game is Witcher. It’s gonna be fucking amazing since they upped the quality of their team so much to rebuild this game.

    I’m ready!

  7. IIWhiteHawkII

    I remember it had aroun ~ 4 – 4.5 score in PSN, which equals 8-9/10. It’s awesome **and** fair IMO.

    Yes, they’ve fucked up the release. Yes, game still undewhelms in some aspects. I’d give it only 8 (but solid 8) myself although it’s one of my best games this generation and of all time. And yes, we as a community should reach devs and send them signs when they do something wrong with any methods available.

    But I sincerely believe CDP completely received all punishments for their flaws. Although 2077 eventually sold well and had enough of hype, I believe entire fiasco and scandals were big enough to be a lesson for them.

    But somewhere behind entire backlash and drama there was still a good, solid game that really deserves a good score. And now, once it feels closest to be kinda finished and completed and keeping the fact that CDP didn’t give up on it 3 years later – makes now good reviews well-deserved.

    I mean, we must be justful. CDP did shitty moves but 2077 is at least decent game overall. And it’s just unfair to kill the game because publisher messed up with management decisions. If we want industry to be transparent and actually rewarding for truly good projects made with passion – we should be able to know when and who to attack and when & what to defend.

  8. This game came such a long way. I am maybe a bit sad that by now I played it SO MUCH over the past years, that I don’t have the patience anymore for it like I used to. When it is actually the best version of itself.

  9. styxAsterios

    It has Always been close to 80%, it was something like 77-78 % at launch

  10. crosslegbow

    Deserves to be higher, they have put in so much work since they lied in the marketing and launch. Should have been a next gen from the very start.

  11. Only gonks care about steam reviews. Watch some gameplay, read up on features, then decide for yourself. I’ve played games for hundreds of hours that have reviews in the 50% range and I’ve hated games with 80%+ reviews.

  12. Atys_SLC

    The last game update from the studio who said that there would be no more game update.

  13. jarjarbangs690

    Cyberware capacity still bugged pls fix it😘

  14. Only took them 3 years since release to actually have the features they advertised. It’s good game now for sure but this is what the game should’ve been at release imo

Write A Comment