I always liked bo4 never thought it was phenomenal, but it’s way better than what’s being made right now
BetiroVal
It’s cyclic nature, true of any fandom really.
I can’t think of any zombies title, post-BO1 that hasn’t been rabidly attacked during its life cycle.
– BO2 was criticised by people since “there was too much running around, not enough killing zombies”
People *fervently* hated Tranzit, Nuketown and Die Rise.
Fans were opposed to buildables, since they were deemed irritating.
Nobody liked Victis and the new storyline.
– Advanced Warfare was criticised for ‘stealing Treyarch’s game mode’
were frustrated by the games mechanics, notably the special enemies and the infected mechanic.
Fans hated Burgertown, calling it worse than Tranzit.
– BO3 was criticised for its sudden shift to a fantasy setting, complaining about aliens and dragons. They also felt like the story became meaningless, especially after Revelations.
They hated the lack of weapon variety and the amount of setup in each map.
Fans also hated Gobblegums, and before the game even launched, people genuinely believed that they had replaced perks.
People ONLY warmed up to it because of Zombies Chronicles.
– IW was criticised, yet again for being a zombies rip, but moreso because it was ‘too goofy’ instead of the nitty gritty that fans liked.
They complained that the zombies felt glitchy, the weapons too weak and the map layout horrible.
Fans also fervently hated the Afterlife Arcade.
– WW2 was
MonsterHunter6353
Bo4 has been getting appreciation since at least cold war. If anything it has died down a little now
TimmyTheFrog
My opinion hasn’t changed. I think BO4 is unenjoyable. I don’t like the point system, the perk system or the PAP system. I don’t like the overly aggressive zombie AI. I think the graphics look bad and whilst that is subjective, the game *was* rushed as far as I remember.
khai115_2
Yep I could definitely see some people in 2026 finding a reason to say Vanguard is better than whatever we get at that time.
5 Comments
I always liked bo4 never thought it was phenomenal, but it’s way better than what’s being made right now
It’s cyclic nature, true of any fandom really.
I can’t think of any zombies title, post-BO1 that hasn’t been rabidly attacked during its life cycle.
– BO2 was criticised by people since “there was too much running around, not enough killing zombies”
People *fervently* hated Tranzit, Nuketown and Die Rise.
Fans were opposed to buildables, since they were deemed irritating.
Nobody liked Victis and the new storyline.
– Advanced Warfare was criticised for ‘stealing Treyarch’s game mode’
were frustrated by the games mechanics, notably the special enemies and the infected mechanic.
Fans hated Burgertown, calling it worse than Tranzit.
– BO3 was criticised for its sudden shift to a fantasy setting, complaining about aliens and dragons. They also felt like the story became meaningless, especially after Revelations.
They hated the lack of weapon variety and the amount of setup in each map.
Fans also hated Gobblegums, and before the game even launched, people genuinely believed that they had replaced perks.
People ONLY warmed up to it because of Zombies Chronicles.
– IW was criticised, yet again for being a zombies rip, but moreso because it was ‘too goofy’ instead of the nitty gritty that fans liked.
They complained that the zombies felt glitchy, the weapons too weak and the map layout horrible.
Fans also fervently hated the Afterlife Arcade.
– WW2 was
Bo4 has been getting appreciation since at least cold war. If anything it has died down a little now
My opinion hasn’t changed. I think BO4 is unenjoyable. I don’t like the point system, the perk system or the PAP system. I don’t like the overly aggressive zombie AI. I think the graphics look bad and whilst that is subjective, the game *was* rushed as far as I remember.
Yep I could definitely see some people in 2026 finding a reason to say Vanguard is better than whatever we get at that time.