Agree or disagree?

35 Comments

  1. joeplus5

    I’m not opposed to MW having zombies if infinity ward actually did it themselves

  2. SpringerTheNerd

    I understand the mindset but I’m personally very excited for this new zombies mode. I put hundreds of hours into DMZ so throwing zombies into it sounds like a great time. Considering they are utilizing Warzone assets I don’t see this taking up all too much dev resources

  3. WaltuhDaZombieSlayuh

    He’s saying exactly what I’ve been saying ever since the mode was announce. Leave zombies to Treyarch games! If Sledgehammer is incompetent to make a third mode hire new devs, jesus

  4. WhiteWidow0421

    Outbreak was successful in Cold War and thats the audience they are aiming for. If you are a zombies player that loves hard easter eggs and round-based, you are not their audience.

    I assume they have data analysts that show and prove that they will earn more money and will have more enjoyment out of players in the Outbreak audience and not the Round-Based one. Casual players are on the increase, and I imagine hardcore players are on the decline.

  5. Nickster2042

    They put zombies on a warzone map and called it a day yall there was nothing of value lost besides maybe a wonder weapon

  6. plantsforlife2

    Blame Activision for this. I rather they do the bare minimum now then in 2024.

  7. ItsMeSpooks

    I mean, as long as the mode is fun and has some interesting gameplay, I don’t mind it.

  8. FishyG23

    Completely depends on if its good or not. If it ends up being a ton of fun it would be a great new mode to have alongside roundbased.

  9. DiscordModRun

    This is one of the content creators that inspired Bo4 hate. Dude doesn’t know quality when he see’s it *spits*

  10. TacoEatingNinja

    I’d rather have each developer have their own zombies team so treyarch isn’t slapped onto other CODs to help them with their zombies mode

  11. Fallout_Nerd101

    Massive disagree, I’m tired of round based every single time and I want to at least get hands on MWIII Zombies before I start saying it’s over.

  12. Last-Addendum132

    Yeah, and however this turns out, this game gave Treyarch’s next game another year in the oven so, thank you MW3.

  13. He’s 100% right.

    No mode is better than a half arsed mode. Especially considering the next ACTUAL zombie experience is currently being developed. Why waste any resources at all?

  14. fiery-hedgehog

    glad he said it. Was he present at the event too? Probably will get blacklisted from events like roflwaffles if not already

  15. Awesomedogman4

    Zombies should take time, better safe then sorry

  16. MrPinkCuck

    I FULLY agree. There was literally zero reason MW3 needed zombies, and you can tell simply by looking at the gameplay footage. If this impedes at all on their actual game next year I’m gonna be a tad upset.

  17. grajuicy

    Agree. When each company does their own zombies they put a nice twist into it, like IW zombies or Exo Zombies, and it’s refreshing.

    And if Treyarch has to develop this whole new Zombies gamemode, they don’t have this year of development time for their own maps and game.

    Still trying to stay optimistic about mw3 zombies. Looks like it can be fun even if it is very different

  18. fakesowdy

    I want zombies not Warzone lite with zombies

  19. TheJackFroster

    A broken child scamming and girl abusing clock is right twice a day I suppose

  20. GolemThe3rd

    I mean true, I’m still looking forward to MW3Z tho

  21. Shaun_LaDee

    I agree, but also COD development currently is not the same as it was back in the 2010s. EVERY studio is working on this game, not just Sledgehammer and Treyarch. It’s no wonder the quality of each game has been on a steady decline since MW2019. COD isn’t a entry based series anymore, it’s a live service with a annual subscription fee of $70.

  22. AggravatedBattery

    I strongly agree. Treyarch needs to be left to their graces and make their own games. They (and Sledgehammer too) are not IW’s fucking support team, or Activision’s filler years.

    All MW3 should’ve been imo is a year 2 extension of MW2 and a $20-30 campaign/spec-ops DLC.

  23. Pricerocks

    I wish Ton would’ve wasted zero resources on trying to scam kids with a fake CSGO skin lottery but we can’t all get what we want.

    Insane that this guy is still around in the community.

  24. jonacraft7

    I think they can do both, but only working on mw3 by guiding another team that isnt treyarch

  25. SentientGopro115935

    This is an absolute recycling bin, so atleast I doubt too much Treyarch time is going on it.

Write A Comment