1080 @240, as long as the screen is 27″ or smaller.
digitallywasted
What kind of question is this? 1080p with 240 fps ofc
OpenChordBreakdown
everyones going to say 1080p because alot of people on here are poorer
AltairdeFiren
4K 60FPS imo.. 60FPS is the minimum though. Anything below that and you’re better off just doing 1080p. FPS is a diminishing returns type thing so the difference between 50-60 feels worlds different from 60-144 or 240. I primarily do 144fps but occasionally (like Cyberpunk with RT) have to drop it down to capped at 60 and there is a slight perceivable difference, but not enough to really matter.
FaithlessnessOld7089
4k absolutely. You can run 1080p at a 1:1 4x downscale while having all the 4k goodness when you’re not gaming, AND get high fps for optimized/undemanding games at 4k.
shredmasterJ
Neither. 2k 144.
brouge22
1080p 240hz, easy. 1440p 165 is my preference, but out of your choices, def 1080p
jvyrdn024
1600 x 900
20fps
xtracasual9000
Who cares. I just want to play the game.
AngriestAardvark
1440p at 144 fps
GetCancerSpezUcunt
2560*1440p 165hz baby
Professional-Rate228
Depends on the game. Counter strike 2, 1080p. Rdr2, 4k.
Gold_Appointment_492
Single player games 4k60. Competitive multiplayer 1080p 240.
PJBuzz
4k60 for me.
Reality is in-between is where the sweet spot is, but I love me some pixels.
sunderwire
Id choose 1440p 120 fps. But if only these 2 options are available then 4k60
Mexicutioner1987
1080p, 120fps. Anything more in either direction is just flexing with very little noticeable gains. I definitely prefer frames over resolution, any day.
NonviolentOffender
1080p240
ModernRubber
The real financially irresponsible go for 4k 144hz
RetnikLevaw
3440×1440 80-144fps depending on game.
Invincie
Fps say nothing nomore. Dlss 3.0 frame generation made sure of that.
I-Miss-RIF
Add another to the pile
1440p 144hz
Thisisthelasttimeido
Of the two? 4k 60.
But 1440p 120/144 would be nice too
arkie87
Obviously depends on the game. Fast paced/twitch shooter— 1080p.
Slower, simulation or RPG, definitely 4K.
Can also go in between with QHD @ 135Hz.
Thebombuknow
1440p 144hz.
It just so happens to be what I play at anyway.
ksio89
1440p120.
Ok-Acanthisitta9127
I know anything beyond 60fps will feel epic, but I am so used to 60fps, I don’t wish to game at 120/144. I tend to choose quality over performance, so I might be in the minority. Also, I’m not a super competitive gamer. In the recent Phantom Libery, for example, I chose to play with Path Tracing turned on regardless of the performance hit on my 3080 Ti (but still very playable on UW resolution).
kura0kamii
1440p 144 fps
DanteFTW
I need to choose between 4k and high frame rate? Who decided that!?
32 Comments
1440p 144
1080 @240, as long as the screen is 27″ or smaller.
What kind of question is this? 1080p with 240 fps ofc
everyones going to say 1080p because alot of people on here are poorer
4K 60FPS imo.. 60FPS is the minimum though. Anything below that and you’re better off just doing 1080p. FPS is a diminishing returns type thing so the difference between 50-60 feels worlds different from 60-144 or 240. I primarily do 144fps but occasionally (like Cyberpunk with RT) have to drop it down to capped at 60 and there is a slight perceivable difference, but not enough to really matter.
4k absolutely. You can run 1080p at a 1:1 4x downscale while having all the 4k goodness when you’re not gaming, AND get high fps for optimized/undemanding games at 4k.
Neither. 2k 144.
1080p 240hz, easy. 1440p 165 is my preference, but out of your choices, def 1080p
1600 x 900
20fps
Who cares. I just want to play the game.
1440p at 144 fps
2560*1440p 165hz baby
Depends on the game. Counter strike 2, 1080p. Rdr2, 4k.
Single player games 4k60. Competitive multiplayer 1080p 240.
4k60 for me.
Reality is in-between is where the sweet spot is, but I love me some pixels.
Id choose 1440p 120 fps. But if only these 2 options are available then 4k60
1080p, 120fps. Anything more in either direction is just flexing with very little noticeable gains. I definitely prefer frames over resolution, any day.
1080p240
The real financially irresponsible go for 4k 144hz
3440×1440 80-144fps depending on game.
Fps say nothing nomore. Dlss 3.0 frame generation made sure of that.
Add another to the pile
1440p 144hz
Of the two? 4k 60.
But 1440p 120/144 would be nice too
Obviously depends on the game. Fast paced/twitch shooter— 1080p.
Slower, simulation or RPG, definitely 4K.
Can also go in between with QHD @ 135Hz.
1440p 144hz.
It just so happens to be what I play at anyway.
1440p120.
I know anything beyond 60fps will feel epic, but I am so used to 60fps, I don’t wish to game at 120/144. I tend to choose quality over performance, so I might be in the minority. Also, I’m not a super competitive gamer. In the recent Phantom Libery, for example, I chose to play with Path Tracing turned on regardless of the performance hit on my 3080 Ti (but still very playable on UW resolution).
1440p 144 fps
I need to choose between 4k and high frame rate? Who decided that!?
Fuck 1080 this isn’t 2005
1440p 170fps
4K60 for Single Player
1080p240 for Multi Player