how is it supposed to run on ps4 if it requires a 4790k for lowest lol
bedwars_player
welp… my gtx 1080 has a 1660ti beat… and is close enough ish kindasorta to a 2070… so i think then only thing i dont meet is 40 gigs of ssd storage… because my ssd is a 256 gig… and its really full…
welp…
MyUsernameBox
Soo whats above Ultra?
GraceRaccoon
How this isn’t just the standard is mind boggling to me. Started PC gaming in 2017 and quickly found these sorts sheets pretty useless since I’m at 1080p.
w1ckizer
I got my brother a GTX 1080 a few years ago, and I can’t believe he’s still able to play all these games with medium/high settings and still get 60fps. Such a great card.
faulieh
A game I could actually run on higher settings, woooo
CMDR_DarkNeutrino
Oh look finally a game with actual 2023 specs. And not 4090+ minimum. *Cough* starfield *cough*
PlentyAdvertising15
its kinda funny when its really come out and see the real performance and frame drop
HankThrill69420
For all the bullshit we put up with particularly with game optimization, especially with Ubisoft, this is very reasonable.
The 1080p60 specs are literally my brother’s PC which I sold him at a slight loss for $200. that’s just fine.
Khomuna
Pretty reasonable specs, now it remains to be seen if they’re true. AC games are famously inconsistent.
Kasaeru
I wonder how high my frames will be @1440p
Thechosenjon
Who would have thought that in a year full of disappointing releases and titles in beta states being sold at retail prices, that Ubisoft and Assassins’ Creed would come along to deliver us a stable and seemingly optimized game?
BigE1263
I love how no one is talking about the games file size.
Flatulence8778
Very reasonable specs for once. My 3060 ti and 5600x dont feel like dregs anymore lol.
These publishers and gpu mfrs have to stop marketing their top end hardware as the only way to go — there are very few whales out there and plenty of us who just wants to spend a modest amount for a high end system.
User17119436
there’s gonna be like nothing to do in this game’s world ofc its small
BluDYT
This should be the norm, so many developers I swear just pick random parts out of thin air without ever testing them.
space0watch
I have a Ryzen 5 2600, RX 580 8GB, and 16GB of RAM so I can probably run it on low settings. I am ok with that as long as it runs at least at 30 fps. Hopefully it will come to Geforce Now.
orenong166
I do exactly the same in my game, only difference is that instead of writing the target FPS I write “minimum and recommend” so that people can tell if their computer meets the minimum or recommend specifications
25 Comments
These are not requirements. They are recommended specs to hit the metrics listed.
This is a good evolution for requirements. It’s so rare to see what “Recommended” specs actually mean for the experience.
How much fps is expected with an rtx 4090 in 1440p in this game ? 170 fps ?
I’m just glad I made the “Recommended Specs”. Knowing I’ll hit 60FPS is nice.
Looks like ill be able to max this game out 😊
Can’t wait for the day we see an Intel GPU in the Ultra-Section
Isn’t it like standard nowadays? A lot of other games did that already.
https://preview.redd.it/rptf52ecxzrb1.png?width=2456&format=png&auto=webp&s=8b244f0beba066983e3692c09521a0a46cda5c42
[https://static.cdprojektred.com/cms.cdprojektred.com/e4fde54e7fcfca001f98a02d2594d9435806d700.jpg?gasgm](https://static.cdprojektred.com/cms.cdprojektred.com/e4fde54e7fcfca001f98a02d2594d9435806d700.jpg?gasgm)
how is it supposed to run on ps4 if it requires a 4790k for lowest lol
welp… my gtx 1080 has a 1660ti beat… and is close enough ish kindasorta to a 2070… so i think then only thing i dont meet is 40 gigs of ssd storage… because my ssd is a 256 gig… and its really full…
welp…
Soo whats above Ultra?
How this isn’t just the standard is mind boggling to me. Started PC gaming in 2017 and quickly found these sorts sheets pretty useless since I’m at 1080p.
I got my brother a GTX 1080 a few years ago, and I can’t believe he’s still able to play all these games with medium/high settings and still get 60fps. Such a great card.
A game I could actually run on higher settings, woooo
Oh look finally a game with actual 2023 specs. And not 4090+ minimum. *Cough* starfield *cough*
its kinda funny when its really come out and see the real performance and frame drop
For all the bullshit we put up with particularly with game optimization, especially with Ubisoft, this is very reasonable.
The 1080p60 specs are literally my brother’s PC which I sold him at a slight loss for $200. that’s just fine.
Pretty reasonable specs, now it remains to be seen if they’re true. AC games are famously inconsistent.
I wonder how high my frames will be @1440p
Who would have thought that in a year full of disappointing releases and titles in beta states being sold at retail prices, that Ubisoft and Assassins’ Creed would come along to deliver us a stable and seemingly optimized game?
I love how no one is talking about the games file size.
Very reasonable specs for once. My 3060 ti and 5600x dont feel like dregs anymore lol.
These publishers and gpu mfrs have to stop marketing their top end hardware as the only way to go — there are very few whales out there and plenty of us who just wants to spend a modest amount for a high end system.
there’s gonna be like nothing to do in this game’s world ofc its small
This should be the norm, so many developers I swear just pick random parts out of thin air without ever testing them.
I have a Ryzen 5 2600, RX 580 8GB, and 16GB of RAM so I can probably run it on low settings. I am ok with that as long as it runs at least at 30 fps. Hopefully it will come to Geforce Now.
I do exactly the same in my game, only difference is that instead of writing the target FPS I write “minimum and recommend” so that people can tell if their computer meets the minimum or recommend specifications