Hey,

I’m seeing a counter-intuitive behavior with my AMD 9950X3D and I’m trying to understand what’s actually happening. Really hope I can get some help.

For comparison, sharing two videos from two different points in time (check top left corner for MSI Afterburner graphs:

So the difference essentially: lower power, same clocks, but higher temps.

Cooling upgrades made between the two videos

  • Thermal paste: stock vendor paste –> Noctua NT-H2
  • AIO: Deepcool LE360 V2 (360mm) –> Arctic Liquid Freezer III Pro 420mm
  • Case airflow: 3 intake + 1 exhaust –> 4× Noctua NF-A12 G2 intake + 1× NF-A14 exhaust
  • All fans + AIO are now run aggressively via FanControl, scaling to ~100% once CPU Tdie > 55 °C. I believe I had a similar aggressive fan curve set in the earlier video as well but it was configured via the BIOS.

Mounting pressure and paste application have been checked multiple times by a technician.

Other differences

  • Added 2× Samsung 990 Pro Gen4 SSDs in the M2_3 / M2_4 slots of my MSI X870E-Tomahawk WiFi Motherboard
  • Scheduler changes:
    • Older video: CPPC Dynamic Preferred Cores = Driver
    • Newer video: CPPC = Auto, Windows Game Mode = Off**. Process Lasso** used to pin Genshin Impact to CCD0 only (via the CPU Sets option)
  • PBO (newer video):
    • Boost override: None
    • Overdrive Scalar: Auto
    • Curve Optimizer: CCD0 −20 / CCD1 −15
    • Temp limit: 100 °C
  • (Not 100% sure if I used Auto PBO or similar manual settings in the older video)

Core question

With:

  • significantly better cooling,
  • lower package power,
  • identical boost clocks,

Why am I seeing higher sustained temperatures than before?
Is this simply increased heat density / CCD0 concentration due to scheduler + CO behavior, or is there something else I should be looking at?

Any insights from people familiar with X3D thermals, CPPC vs Process Lasso, or PBO/CO behavior would be appreciated.