Hi guys,
I'm fairly new to CO per core (on previous 5700X3D I've just pull -25 all cores, got 9800X3D now, won't be changing it for years so I want to find perfect settings once and keep it like that for years).
In my new cpu core 0,1 are the best, cores 6,7 are the worst. I've followed below guide and ended up with -1, -0, -7, -6, -6, -12, -11 with voltages ~1.190V and -16, -15, -24, -23, -23, -22, -32, -29 with voltages ~1.120V
https://www.overclock.net/threads/amd-ryzen-curve-optimizer-per-core.1814427/#replies
If I understood correctly, in case of multicore computing, all cores get same voltage (of the core with highest voltage needed), so if I put CO -32 all cores, in ie. cine, all cores would run ~1.120V due to core 6 running 1.120V with -32 offset. But in case of single core workload, voltage will very (ie. between 1.080V on C0 to 1.120V on C6).
With CO per core (-16, -15, -24, -23, -23, -22, -32, -29), cores will run ~1.120V regardless if it's single or multicore workload.
questions:
1. if C0 and C1 are better (meaning that in stock conditions they can run 5.2ghz clock with lower voltage) than the rest, wouldn't they be better off with even higher offset (ie. -20 making them run ~1.100V during singlecore workloads) since they are better so they can be pushed harder?
2. if C6 and C7 are crap and amd/board deducted they need higher voltage to be stable, isn't offsetting them harder to keep same voltage as best cores, effectively undermining whole concept of best/worst core as we effectively ignore that and equalize their voltages?