I think it is important so we have more options and competition in the space.

41 Comments

  1. WootBeavers

    Of course. More competition is better for savvy consumers.

    Uninformed customers might get an ugly stick (for their use-case), but I’m willing to pay that price.

  2. creamcolouredDog

    “I think it is important so we have more options and competition in the space” = I want a controlled competition to keep Nvidia in check so I can buy their GPUs for cheaper

  3. schlunzloewe

    At the Moment i’m more concerned wether they are exiting the CPU space. /s

  4. ThagomizerDuck

    Absolutely.

    The issue is that the competition that would normally drive innovation isn’t actually driving the latter fast enough.

    AMD keeps dropping the ball every time Nvidia opens the door for them to bring the heat and Intel is just simply behind. (for now)

    The issue is that Nvidia can stop making consumer GPUs tomorrow and AMD and Intel would still struggle to fill that space performance wise. And that’s even with AMD much closer in real world performance against most of Nvidia’s lineup.

    Intel is a whole ‘nother beast that has a long way to go in the “supercar” genre.

    And finally, we also have to realize that GPUs are one part of the problem we face in most of the consumer space: shit optimization and *heavy* reliance frame generation is making otherwise decent to good to great cards struggle or feel obsolete.

  5. laser_velociraptor

    Everyone will say they love it. Yet, no one will buy them.

  6. buzzyboy42

    Yeah, except the intel employees at the intel museum don’t know anything about it apparently.

  7. ewikthewed

    I’m glad there is another one, but not sure Intel is gonna be a savior. Havent they been on the downward spiral as of late? How confident are we that they will even last more than a few generations.

  8. meltingpotato

    Intel **has** entered the GPU market a while ago now and competition is always good.

  9. RareSiren292

    Competition is always worse for everyone. Why can’t Nvidia just be a monopoly? Nvidia should just be the market. I think $3000 for a 5080 is fair. I’d pay $4000 for a 4070 if they let me.

    [OBVIOUS RAGE BAIT SHOULD BE OBVIOUS]

  10. forcemonkey

    Yes. Just would be interesting if they entered the CPU space.

  11. FALLASLEEPFOREVERE

    Apparently they lose money on every GPU they put on the market and they a loss to make it look like a real bargain and tempt people to their products

  12. SumonaFlorence

    Nvidia even dominates in the picture.. poor AMD.

  13. SicSenpaiTyrannis

    I’m just bothered that the bottom left corner of the AMD triangle doesn’t overlap the Nvidia triangle.

  14. They are? Intel released ARC back in 2022 and I was under the impression they are exiting the GPU space these days, other than some integrated graphics stuff for some of their CPUs.

  15. massivemember69

    I am! More competition means more innovation and more incentive to keep gpu prices honest.

  16. Strange-Scarcity

    Yes.

    I look forward to Intel’s offerings to continue to be more affordable, but improving greatly over time with the way they talked about continued development of their drivers.

  17. CritStarrHD

    It’s kinda mind blowing that a competent chinese competitor hasn’t entered the market yet

  18. I am glad, but also disappointed about their CPU division.

  19. i am in a way

    I like competition heck we need a 5080/5090 competitor but intel is to scattered right now with the trump administration getting rid of the intel/biden deal the mass layoffs and the recent cpu line having horrible sales they could get bought out nvidia can write off that expense in a year.

    Intel right now seems to be in a tight cash spot lets hope they wont stop the gaming gpu line to favor cpu/server ai stuff like ai workstation gpus.

  20. EffectivePrimary1783

    I probably make a CPU GPU Intel for 2030~.

  21. Triforce of wisdom? Sure. Too bad Amd and Nvidia colors aren’t swapped, Nvidia is definitely the triforce of power. 

  22. It doesn’t matter in the slightest. Get ready for the Chinese Century baby

  23. zakkwaldo

    this graphic bugs me, why are amd’s 2 corners covered while intel and nvidias get one corner to overlap onto the other 2 competitors?

  24. clichepioneer

    I’d be more excited if 3Dfx lurched back into existence.

  25. you made the triforce wrong, the triangles dont overlap

    the ends of the triangle are supposed to be touching

  26. As of now it doesn’t look like Intel is going to disrupt the GPU market. They’re a minor improvement in the low end as of now. Hopefully they’ll give us some slightly better price/ perf in mid end. I’m happy about it, but not hyped.

    What I’m much more hyped about is Nvidia entering the handheld market. We will finally get proper upscaling in handhelds. Much better efficiency. On top of that they’ll hopefully force AMD to implement FSR4 in APUs sooner and more games on ARM.

    Cyberpunk for example looks absolutely stunning on Switch2. As of now Nvidia absolutely demolished any competition at low power. It’s insane considering it’s a very low tier chip. Graphics are based on RTX 3000 architecture. Imagine we had some modern Nvidia chip. Imagine we had that on a much more open handheld with more games <3

  27. xTeamRwbyx

    As long as I don’t pull an Nvidia and start making dumbass cards that makes zero sense to make

  28. Aeroncastle

    I miss Intel in the CPU space, every CPU in a best 20 CPUs list in AMD and since there is no competition prices are not dropping. I live in a country with weak currency and would like to buy a Ryzen 3d processor but since they launched they are 1-2 months of work in price and fuck that, I got bills to pay

  29. Windows-XP-Home-NEW

    It’s pissing me off that those triangles overlap.

  30. datNorseman

    More competition is good, but their initial attempts are not up to par with what a modern gpu should be. If they get better then it’s all worth it, but until then I will not be using an Intel gpu.

Write A Comment