Nah, sbmm protects trash tier players. Anyone who is slightly above average or better are the ones who feel it the most. More cheaters in lobby’s that are 1.4kd+. Shit take.
Fair-Field-1056
Wrong. Shit take. I’m casual and SBMM and ebmm are absolutely ruining the game
Particular-Skill-246
Just give us connection based lobbies like back in the day man
SBRBOUS
“When XDefiant was released, a bunch of people rushed into its lobbies to try a ‘CoD game without SBMM,’ only to realize they’d been protected all along by the very SBMM they and their favorite YouTubers kicked and screamed to have removed. Laughable.”
Mulisha_Wes
🙌
Paindressedinpurple
I think this can be true, which is also why top tier guys are in lobbies where ppl don’t shoot back. There are streamers who play against other pros and can never post a 1.0 yet they’re slamming pubs all day. If sbmm was as cracked as it’s made to be, you wouldn’t have guys running around with 4.0.
Lewd_boi_69
Honestly… yeah. Sbmm has saved the mechanical race that is call of duty.
Broad_Positive1790
Either this guy is paid or he’s in the protected lobby that sbmm was to protect.
GreyWolfCenturion
It’s fun to hear my buddies brag about their stats, AND gripe about sbmm, only to drop into my lobbies and get absolutely farmed.
Like, I don’t like sbmm, but that’s because I want to chew up the normies that aren’t allowed into my arena. Playing other sweats can be tiring.
I’m against it for absolutely selfish reasons. And sure, people can speculate that it would damage the games’ appeal in the long run, but I don’t actually believe it. The games got popular without sbmm, and I think the casuals should face the hard climb.
Not like it matters anyway, we know the devs have made their decisions based on their own strategies and projections, it isn’t like they are using sbmm on accident. So the crying on either side won’t matter, any more than the complaints about the store content and pricing.
Affectionate-Foot802
Propaganda? Creating a system that punishes players for getting better at the game by placing them against increasingly more challenging opponents instead of rewarding their dedication and then feeding them bad players when they’re on a losing streak in order to maximize player retention and saying it “creates fair matches” is literally corporate propaganda made to increase shareholder value. It does not make the game more fun or more fair, it makes it more addictive. Fair would be matching players based on location. You don’t play much, you shouldn’t win much, that’s how fairness works. You wanna know why every PvP fps game is so sweaty now to a point where the devs literally have to create dedicated AI bot matches? Sbmm has created an environment that demands players constantly get better if they want to perform consistently and it should be no surprise that they do considering how important winning is even to trash players who don’t even care enough about the game to learn how to play it properly. And all of this so that the suits can line their pockets while they laugh at you for being so brainwashed.
Free_Football_9169
This is exactly how trump tricked these people into voting him into office for a second term
ThatKidDrew
too bad CoD doesn’t have SBMM, it has EOMM! criminally using the same strategies that casino games used to keep you hooked. shameless just the creator of this video
THEGREATWUMB0
I believe ranked play should be based on actual ranks (and not SBMM) and pubs should be based on connection.
Madrimious
Ceeday is part of em
Equivalent-Lab8655
Found the shitty bot who can’t hang wjthout sbmm. This guy is stupid and so are you. If sbmm is so good then why do COD games die wayy faster than they used to back in the day? If sbmm is so good why were COD games even popular back then? Clown.
Ok-Drama-4262
he do really have good point
Excellent-Trifle9086
Even though I’ll subscribe to some CoD streamers for comparing their recommended loadouts vs what’s on Warzone meta sights, I lost respect for all of them when in the course of a month 2 streamers I follow put out videos where they matter of fact-ly explain why they two box and why they think there’s nothing wrong with it. Essentially, both said “I have a 4.0 K/D, so two boxing puts me into lower skill lobbies to make content more enjoyable.”
Let ’em complain about SBMM, they’ll find ways to make sure they’re in 0.2 K/D lobbies so they can get 30+ kills all while the comments are asking why all their opponents barely move, lol.
-Quiche-
There’s SBMM and “SBMM”. Old games like Halo 2 has the former and they were a blast, so I don’t mind the concept of SBMM.
However, I’m very cynical about how current publishers implement their flavor of it.
Direspark
The really crazy thing is if you look through the comments from people on this post who are anti-SBMM, they don’t even all have the same definition of what it means. Just brainwashed.
19 Comments
Nah, sbmm protects trash tier players. Anyone who is slightly above average or better are the ones who feel it the most. More cheaters in lobby’s that are 1.4kd+. Shit take.
Wrong. Shit take. I’m casual and SBMM and ebmm are absolutely ruining the game
Just give us connection based lobbies like back in the day man
“When XDefiant was released, a bunch of people rushed into its lobbies to try a ‘CoD game without SBMM,’ only to realize they’d been protected all along by the very SBMM they and their favorite YouTubers kicked and screamed to have removed. Laughable.”
🙌
I think this can be true, which is also why top tier guys are in lobbies where ppl don’t shoot back. There are streamers who play against other pros and can never post a 1.0 yet they’re slamming pubs all day. If sbmm was as cracked as it’s made to be, you wouldn’t have guys running around with 4.0.
Honestly… yeah. Sbmm has saved the mechanical race that is call of duty.
Either this guy is paid or he’s in the protected lobby that sbmm was to protect.
It’s fun to hear my buddies brag about their stats, AND gripe about sbmm, only to drop into my lobbies and get absolutely farmed.
Like, I don’t like sbmm, but that’s because I want to chew up the normies that aren’t allowed into my arena. Playing other sweats can be tiring.
I’m against it for absolutely selfish reasons. And sure, people can speculate that it would damage the games’ appeal in the long run, but I don’t actually believe it. The games got popular without sbmm, and I think the casuals should face the hard climb.
Not like it matters anyway, we know the devs have made their decisions based on their own strategies and projections, it isn’t like they are using sbmm on accident. So the crying on either side won’t matter, any more than the complaints about the store content and pricing.
Propaganda? Creating a system that punishes players for getting better at the game by placing them against increasingly more challenging opponents instead of rewarding their dedication and then feeding them bad players when they’re on a losing streak in order to maximize player retention and saying it “creates fair matches” is literally corporate propaganda made to increase shareholder value. It does not make the game more fun or more fair, it makes it more addictive. Fair would be matching players based on location. You don’t play much, you shouldn’t win much, that’s how fairness works. You wanna know why every PvP fps game is so sweaty now to a point where the devs literally have to create dedicated AI bot matches? Sbmm has created an environment that demands players constantly get better if they want to perform consistently and it should be no surprise that they do considering how important winning is even to trash players who don’t even care enough about the game to learn how to play it properly. And all of this so that the suits can line their pockets while they laugh at you for being so brainwashed.
This is exactly how trump tricked these people into voting him into office for a second term
too bad CoD doesn’t have SBMM, it has EOMM! criminally using the same strategies that casino games used to keep you hooked. shameless just the creator of this video
I believe ranked play should be based on actual ranks (and not SBMM) and pubs should be based on connection.
Ceeday is part of em
Found the shitty bot who can’t hang wjthout sbmm. This guy is stupid and so are you. If sbmm is so good then why do COD games die wayy faster than they used to back in the day? If sbmm is so good why were COD games even popular back then? Clown.
he do really have good point
Even though I’ll subscribe to some CoD streamers for comparing their recommended loadouts vs what’s on Warzone meta sights, I lost respect for all of them when in the course of a month 2 streamers I follow put out videos where they matter of fact-ly explain why they two box and why they think there’s nothing wrong with it. Essentially, both said “I have a 4.0 K/D, so two boxing puts me into lower skill lobbies to make content more enjoyable.”
Let ’em complain about SBMM, they’ll find ways to make sure they’re in 0.2 K/D lobbies so they can get 30+ kills all while the comments are asking why all their opponents barely move, lol.
There’s SBMM and “SBMM”. Old games like Halo 2 has the former and they were a blast, so I don’t mind the concept of SBMM.
However, I’m very cynical about how current publishers implement their flavor of it.
The really crazy thing is if you look through the comments from people on this post who are anti-SBMM, they don’t even all have the same definition of what it means. Just brainwashed.