There is one difference though. One of them is at least open about it. The other tries to fool buyers.
life_konjam_better
From the same company that launched RX 580 8GB with 256bit memory bus for $230 back in 2017, a full 8 years ago.
BlastMode7
Is the 9060 XT 8GB $299? Even more stupid since the 16GB model is only $50 more.
BeerGogglesFTW
AMD should have made it ~$250, but I think at this point, it will sell regardless, so it would just be leaving money on the table.
Yodl007
Is this MSRP the same as the 9070 XT was ? Only for the first 5 cards sold worldwide ?
Housing_Ideas_Party
Stagnation is real, and it’s horrifying
ChucklesNutts
especially with the realization that major textures and physics are now requiring 16GB
Ogirami
ok to be fair nvidia doesn’t see us as consumers anymore and why should they lmao. they earn 20-30x more from their AI chip sales and they dont have to deal with whining man children anymore so its kinda like a win-win for them.
meteorprime
My gtx1070 had that much 😟
Suedewagon
The humble Intel Arc Battlemage
silentdragon95
Luckily, Intel exists with actually decent budget GPU offerings.
Damn, there’s a sentence that would have made *no* sense just a few years ago. But no, really, consider Intel ARC.
Super_flywhiteguy
Lisa and Jensen being related is really starting to show.
Skwalou
AMD spitting on free PR
RISHI__adhikari
Like it or not,
The real problem is with VRAM hungry games, Not with the gpus.
ccAbstraction
Me who is happy with my 6GB GTX1660 for VRChat. :>
3InchesPunisher
Budget consumers? You mean all tier consumers right?
daHaus
Of course they are, the GPU side of AMD said the exact same thing about pivoting to AI slop and would without a doubt be just as bad as nvidia given the chance
Desperate-Intern
I mean we haven’t forgotten their strategy:
`AMD = NVIDIA – $100`
rest copy as much as possible.
John_Doe_MCMXC
You know the saying about beggars…
the_Real_Romak
how’s your favourite corporation treating ya?
pobox1663
Isnt nvidias more expensive? Still stupid for both but at least amd is offering a 16gb for 50 bucks more.
21 Comments
There is one difference though. One of them is at least open about it. The other tries to fool buyers.
From the same company that launched RX 580 8GB with 256bit memory bus for $230 back in 2017, a full 8 years ago.
Is the 9060 XT 8GB $299? Even more stupid since the 16GB model is only $50 more.
AMD should have made it ~$250, but I think at this point, it will sell regardless, so it would just be leaving money on the table.
Is this MSRP the same as the 9070 XT was ? Only for the first 5 cards sold worldwide ?
Stagnation is real, and it’s horrifying
especially with the realization that major textures and physics are now requiring 16GB
ok to be fair nvidia doesn’t see us as consumers anymore and why should they lmao. they earn 20-30x more from their AI chip sales and they dont have to deal with whining man children anymore so its kinda like a win-win for them.
My gtx1070 had that much 😟
The humble Intel Arc Battlemage
Luckily, Intel exists with actually decent budget GPU offerings.
Damn, there’s a sentence that would have made *no* sense just a few years ago. But no, really, consider Intel ARC.
Lisa and Jensen being related is really starting to show.
AMD spitting on free PR
Like it or not,
The real problem is with VRAM hungry games, Not with the gpus.
Me who is happy with my 6GB GTX1660 for VRChat. :>
Budget consumers? You mean all tier consumers right?
Of course they are, the GPU side of AMD said the exact same thing about pivoting to AI slop and would without a doubt be just as bad as nvidia given the chance
I mean we haven’t forgotten their strategy:
`AMD = NVIDIA – $100`
rest copy as much as possible.
You know the saying about beggars…
how’s your favourite corporation treating ya?
Isnt nvidias more expensive? Still stupid for both but at least amd is offering a 16gb for 50 bucks more.