https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq808px90wxo
IANAL, but it seems a bit shaky from a legal perspective.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq808px90wxo
IANAL, but it seems a bit shaky from a legal perspective.
3 Comments
It was given in an impact statement for sentencing so it doesn’t have any direct legal bearing on the outcome of the case itself. Of course the idea that this is in any way a “version” of the deceased is laughably false. It’s just a way for some relative to feel catharsis about their loss and entertain the idea that he would have forgiven his killer in accordance with his beliefs (Christianity). For everyone else this is just another absurd overreach in claims about what AI is capable of.
Imagine doing some hoop-a-joop with AI copy of the victim providing hearsay testimony being the basis of the killer winning his appeal.
Btw this guy was the road rager that got out of his car and was then shot. How do you say.. ram driver.