Obviously, this year of Warzone we know that they decide to bring back Verdansk.

I’m wondering that if Warzone did fail, do y’all think they would just switch over to focus more on zombies?

17 Comments

  1. Common_Dot526

    Probably, the development resources would have been distributed to MP and Zombies instead of MP, Zombies and Warzone

  2. Nickster2042

    No, the devs who work on warzone would’ve just been fired

    Given how zombies is performing this year I assume the systems would all stay

  3. dolan_senpai

    Bo7 should have bocw atherium upgrade system.

  4. attackhamster42

    In terms of marketing, it’s possible they would have shifted gears to push what they felt was the more engaging mode. In terms of actual game development and content, I don’t know. Correct me if I’m wrong but I thought it was primarily Raven and Beenox that were responsible for Warzone and they have no involvement with Treyarch doing Zombies? So if Warzone did flop with the return of Verdansk the powers that be might have just chosen to fire some folks in those studios while expecting more from the same amount of devs at Treyarch.

  5. Nknown4444

    Bo6 is so peak I freaking love it, it outclasses all but bo3 and only one ups Cold War because it’s the sequel, I don’t want it any different, after Cold War and bo6, old zombies just hasn’t been hitting the same. I’m sure I’ll go back again I always do but DAMN I’m happy with this game

  6. Lauradagirl

    I think the whole franchise would’ve been 10 times better without the Warzone ties, they honestly should’ve just let Warzone die.

  7. Prestigious_Hunt4329

    Would cod be as big as it is now without warzone is the question? Popularity from declined every year after bo2 and seemed to only really get a jump in bo3, and then again with MW2019 and warzone.

  8. MrKaneCola

    All the focus om Warzone wouldve gone to MP, which is the bigger cash cow between MP and Zombie. The only way Zombies get “more” better treatment is if somehow Zombies generate more money than MP.

  9. HotDogGrass2

    probably but tbh I don’t think they’re neglecting zombies by any means. we’ve got three extra maps, more gobblegums, some perks, and zombies themed bundles.

    by the way “more better” is redundant, you can just say better

  10. While yes but that doesn’t mean Black Ops 6 got the “short end of the stick”.

    Overall package wise, BO6 is a pretty solid offering on its own.

    It feels like all 3 modes got a decent amount of effort and care but it’s not a perfect game. Maybe the better one out of most.

    I’d say zombies would’ve been 10% better.

    I’d out BO6 zombies as third place behind BO3 and Cold War zombies.

  11. TheDeStRoYeR_373

    The warzone style for zombies made me hate the game

  12. BreadCruhmbs

    Raven develops Warzone 2. Zombies sucks now because of design choices, not a lack of resources.

  13. Natedoggsk8

    I heard somewhere that war zone was their biggest money maker. It’s a completely different gamer that likes zombies most of the time

  14. Raecino

    How does one have to do with the other? Black Ops 6 Zombies is great as-is.

  15. Raecino

    How does one have to do with the other? Black Ops 6 Zombies is great as-is.

Write A Comment