Warzone 2.0 without the connectivity issue stands as one of the best iterations of Warzone.

12 Comments

  1. chasemooremusic3

    Warzone 2.. the game where there was …

    – no movement
    – insanely fast TTK
    – couldn’t even get your loadout until later in the game at the start
    – no sprinting while plating @ the start
    – way too much visual recoil & gunsmoke
    – no resurgence at the start of the game
    – 2 million different attachments
    – the ugliest UI warzone has ever seen
    – the addition of water combat
    – they added AI/bots lol
    – lower player count
    – slow pacing
    – terrible looting system
    – 2v2 Gulag
    – low currency
    – the worst audio we’ve had in WZ
    – terrible optimization
    – server instability
    – hardly any weapon balancing

    and there’s gotta be more i can’t think of at the moment. Granted there’s a few things they did right. Al Mazrah was a good map as was Vondel. Prox chat. Buying guns + perks was a W..but for the most part it was such a downgrade & was way worse than WZ 1 & 3

  2. My_11th_Account

    You are wrong. Your opinion is literally wrong.

  3. Baby_Hulk87

    Blackout should be S tier. Blackout walked so Warzone could run, also provided us with one of the greatest BR maps ever……Alcatraz Island aka Rebirth

  4. Forsaken-Berry-9196

    There’s a reason why Warzone is the way it is now. Warzone 2.0 is way too high up the tier list.

  5. One-Objective-3715

    whatever helps you sleep at night

  6. I agree. But that’s because I came from PUBG and prefer a classic BR experience. Choices have consequences. That said, I only dislike Caldera. WZ3 is really fun for me now, and looking forward to BO6.

Write A Comment