There’s a lot more to dislike than just the loadouts.
AdEconomy1977
I just hope it’s not as easy as cold war
MathematicianMuch445
To be blunt, pretty much everything they’ve done for years has been hate worthy
Nothing I’ve seen makes me think that’s about to change 😂
TwistedTreelineScrub
The whole thing be lookin pretty mid tbh
[deleted]
[deleted]
DelNaja1
shit meme lol
Vrooother
I think this is kinda shallow, admittedly yes, people disliking something that hasn’t come out yet is weird.
But in the same vain people are allowed to judge things that are already known within the game, loadouts is just one of a plethora of returning things that some aren’t fond of.
Mac541
No one talking about the fact we have to see the Mangler in two brand new maps. That alone will make them feel too familiar. I know they added more enemy types. It’s the ones they don’t remove that become an issue. I’ve kill the Mangler too many times and hate to see it in this game.
SeanSpencers
I loved Cold War. And I loved the Easter eggs in Cold War as well. I’m happy with a “Cold War 2” I’d prefer it as opposed to old zombies tbh.
NovaRipper1
Bo4 – “make it more like bo3”
Bo5 – “make it more like bo3”
Bo6 – “look they made it like bo3, they added gobblegum and they let you change the UI to look nothing like bo3”
Treyarch got to have some serious internal issues with them being this daft intentionally. It’s crazy how infinity ward was able to capture the feel of bo3 better then treyarch has been able to. Its not just loadouts but, armor, ammo boxes, score streaks, no pack animation, salvage. Don’t even bother trying to say that bo3 isn’t even the best zombies when zombies chronicles shattered records, it is consistently top selling and outselling cold war on Xbox, ps, and PC a decade later, and the custom map community is thriving. They also can’t stop name dropping the game from the first interview trying to get players excited just by mentioning bo3. I’m still excited, but man, why they can’t just made another bo3 feeling cod is absurd.
GlorifiedCaveman
Do you work for Treyarch? Why are we not allowed to be critical? Also, how does hesitantcy towards loadouts not count as a concern? Your post is rather reductionist. There are plenty of red flags posted and commented on within this sub and this specific post. To answer your caption , we don’t have to love the whole thing either. Zombies has been diluted since BO3. Why should we expect any different? I mean come on… advertising “A return to round-based zombies” is not the flex they think it is. It’s the obvious and only path forward. BO6 need to win us back, and not expect folks to drop $70+ on an “always online” (which means potentially eventually obsolete) game when they’ve already missed the mark several times.
Hectorlo
I don’t like loadouts, i don’t like weapon rarities, both of which make wall/box weapons meaningless.
I don’t like armor plates, feels like an unnecessary mechanic added just to have sinergy with WZ.
I don’t like enhanced mobility, makes me feel too fast and agile, i should feel vulnerable.
I don’t like gobblegums, they were pay2win cheat codes, now they just aren’t paid anymore.
I don’t like the point system and i don’t understand why they still refuse to go back.
I don’t like Operators, even if they’re optional. Why have the option to begin with? Don’t they have faith in their own characters and their design/writing? Again, just more WZ sinergy.
Want me to go on or should i wait for another dumb meme?
The_Multi_Gamer
My issue is more the points system. It added another reason to use weaker/ineffective weapons. Which leads to another dislike; Pap’d weapons dont have variety outside of a damage boost (AKA I miss Mustang and Sally).
SpeakNowAndEnter
“It’s just Cold War 2”
Dude I already said I’m for it you don’t have to sell it to me!
14 Comments
There’s a lot more to dislike than just the loadouts.
I just hope it’s not as easy as cold war
To be blunt, pretty much everything they’ve done for years has been hate worthy
Nothing I’ve seen makes me think that’s about to change 😂
The whole thing be lookin pretty mid tbh
[deleted]
shit meme lol
I think this is kinda shallow, admittedly yes, people disliking something that hasn’t come out yet is weird.
But in the same vain people are allowed to judge things that are already known within the game, loadouts is just one of a plethora of returning things that some aren’t fond of.
No one talking about the fact we have to see the Mangler in two brand new maps. That alone will make them feel too familiar. I know they added more enemy types. It’s the ones they don’t remove that become an issue. I’ve kill the Mangler too many times and hate to see it in this game.
I loved Cold War. And I loved the Easter eggs in Cold War as well. I’m happy with a “Cold War 2” I’d prefer it as opposed to old zombies tbh.
Bo4 – “make it more like bo3”
Bo5 – “make it more like bo3”
Bo6 – “look they made it like bo3, they added gobblegum and they let you change the UI to look nothing like bo3”
Treyarch got to have some serious internal issues with them being this daft intentionally. It’s crazy how infinity ward was able to capture the feel of bo3 better then treyarch has been able to. Its not just loadouts but, armor, ammo boxes, score streaks, no pack animation, salvage. Don’t even bother trying to say that bo3 isn’t even the best zombies when zombies chronicles shattered records, it is consistently top selling and outselling cold war on Xbox, ps, and PC a decade later, and the custom map community is thriving. They also can’t stop name dropping the game from the first interview trying to get players excited just by mentioning bo3. I’m still excited, but man, why they can’t just made another bo3 feeling cod is absurd.
Do you work for Treyarch? Why are we not allowed to be critical? Also, how does hesitantcy towards loadouts not count as a concern? Your post is rather reductionist. There are plenty of red flags posted and commented on within this sub and this specific post. To answer your caption , we don’t have to love the whole thing either. Zombies has been diluted since BO3. Why should we expect any different? I mean come on… advertising “A return to round-based zombies” is not the flex they think it is. It’s the obvious and only path forward. BO6 need to win us back, and not expect folks to drop $70+ on an “always online” (which means potentially eventually obsolete) game when they’ve already missed the mark several times.
I don’t like loadouts, i don’t like weapon rarities, both of which make wall/box weapons meaningless.
I don’t like armor plates, feels like an unnecessary mechanic added just to have sinergy with WZ.
I don’t like enhanced mobility, makes me feel too fast and agile, i should feel vulnerable.
I don’t like gobblegums, they were pay2win cheat codes, now they just aren’t paid anymore.
I don’t like the point system and i don’t understand why they still refuse to go back.
I don’t like Operators, even if they’re optional. Why have the option to begin with? Don’t they have faith in their own characters and their design/writing? Again, just more WZ sinergy.
Want me to go on or should i wait for another dumb meme?
My issue is more the points system. It added another reason to use weaker/ineffective weapons. Which leads to another dislike; Pap’d weapons dont have variety outside of a damage boost (AKA I miss Mustang and Sally).
“It’s just Cold War 2”
Dude I already said I’m for it you don’t have to sell it to me!