I have played zombies since bo1 but skipped vanguard however it is currently on sale for £25 and I am wondering if it would be worth that price?

40 Comments

  1. FPBackFire

    i mean i had some fun with it and will still play it maybe every now and then, but its very different and has many flaws. If £25 isnt that bad for you sure. You just might be disappointed but you might also find it to be something different and a bit fun like I did.

  2. Embarrassed-Ideal-18

    Zombies, no. Campaign, not really. Multiplayer, no.

    Multiplayer plus campaign plus zombies? Still no. It’s the one cod in recent years that actually feels like they knew it wasn’t good but they had to put something out.

    For all the dlc turned game criticisms mw3 still feels like more of a cod game and less like a low budget clone than vanguard managed to.

  3. Choice-Range9802

    If you’ve played everything else, shino numa isn’t a terrible map 🤷🏻‍♂️ but that would be my only reason to play it

  4. DriveExtension7764

    You’d have to pay me to play that game

  5. Competitive_Fruit901

    If they are paying you £25 per hour, then go for it.

  6. TheHighTierHuman

    I wouldn’t play that shit for free

  7. Outbreak900

    Even if it was free it would still feel like being scammed

  8. Eyezwideopen1090

    I wouldnt download it if they offered me 20$

  9. RandomUncreative_1

    If they pay you 25 bucks for playing it, yes

  10. ColdColt45

    For zombies only shi no numa is worth playing. Guns are horribly slow to level up, making the camo grind just beyond brain numbing with only one real map.

    The multiplayer is also really bad, all the guns end up the same “tsk tsk tsk” sound and same recoil. Arms race is a large map mode, which I had a lot of fun with, but it only got one map.

    I haven’t deleted the game from my console, thinking one day I’ll play shi no numa again, but I never have because I’ll jump on WWII or BO4 zombies.

  11. Gecko420

    I wouldn’t even play it if it was free. Please do not spend your money on that garbage.

  12. nothing_personal_heh

    It’s Not even worth it if it was free

  13. There’s nothing redeeming about the game OP

  14. Youthsonic

    No.

    I’m open to experimentation (I absolutely loved outbreak), but Der Anfang/Terra maledicta suck ass.

    They sucked so much ass the devs gave up and just remade Terra Maledicta as a round based map for the last dlc.

  15. ExpertButtonPresser

    The zombies wasn’t great but I appreciate that they tried different things I do like the mp tho

  16. BaldEagleNor

    Bruh its not worth the *disc space* cmon

  17. Distinct-Ease-820

    I play every CoD. I’ve got all the achievements across the entire Black Ops series. I have all of Vanguard, only a few left for Infinite Warfare, only a few for Advanced Aafare, etc. The only reason I played Vanguard was for the achievements. The very moment I got the last one, I put the game down for good. It has no replay value. The zombies aren’t good. Campaign was too loose, not much of a story behind it, jumping around from bsckstory to backstop of all the characters and all around confusing. If you’re a CoD achievement hunter, go for it. If not, the game isn’t worth it, bro.

  18. Everybody here will tell you know except for me so if no is the answer you’re looking for ask this subreddit. Why do I say yes, because vanguard is underrated after, snnr is a great map and vanguard engine is good

  19. Cyber-Silver

    Vanguard is the exception to the CoD cycle. Instead of the new CoD being hated and the old one becoming loved, Vanguard is still seen as bad

Write A Comment