2K is 2048, 2.5K is 2560

35 Comments

  1. EiffelPower76

    Just say QHD

    And stop adding “p” after the resolution, nobody uses interlaced naymore, so no need to specify “progressive”

  2. TheZoltan

    2K always feels weird as I swear people only started using it after 4k became a popular term. If precision matters I will give the actual X/Y pixel counts but generally use 1080p/1440p/4k when talking about gaming, HD/4k when talking about media, and when downloading media I will search 1080p or 2160p.

  3. Positive-Olive3530

    2560×1440 doesn’t even equal 2.5k idk how y’all are doing math

  4. Mean_Display8494

    4k is not 4k but is technically 3.84

  5. CatatonicMan

    You are technically correct. The best kind of correct.

  6. phu-ken-wb

    I Always assumed 1440p being 2K meant that it had approximately double the pixels, but I now made a quick calculation of that and it seems it has only 1,778 (7 periodic) times the amount of pixels.

  7. sharknice

    Just call it what it actually is, 2560×1440, or 1440p if you must. Not everything needs a “K” name.

    When someone calls a monitor “2k” it’s just a flag for not knowing what they’re talking about.

  8. the_abortionat0r

    If 3840 = 4k then 1920 = 2k.

    Either follow the rules or don’t bother making a meme about it.

  9. IronProdigyOfficial

    I call it what it really is, the perfect middle between graphics and performance. Idk I see almost no difference visibly between 2k and 4k depending on screen size and use.

  10. tigerf117

    HD, FHD, QHD, UHD are my preferred, with UWQHD for ultrawide, and full resolution if it doesn’t fit into those.

  11. It’s all marketing jargon.

    It started as 4K which was a separate DCI resolution standard that’s used in the film industry, and it spread to other desktop resolutions, none of it is actually for monitor resolutions. They’re all different.

    1080p is the closest thing to 2K.

  12. Colonel_Coffee

    4k is 4k because it’s 4 times the pixel density of 1080p, isn’t it? So 1440p is technically 1.778k

  13. onepingonlypleashe

    TIL I have 2.5K monitors. 🤷‍♂️

  14. Moneymoneymoney2018

    The best 1440 monitors are actually 3.4k. 😁

  15. Fluffasaurus89

    1440p is 1440p, anything-k is bullshit marketing terminology.

  16. Tango-Turtle

    Stop confusing me. Just give me full resolution numbers.

  17. Noch_ein_Kamel

    Technically….. this is all “1440p”

    5120 × 1440
    3440 × 1440
    3360 × 1440
    3200 × 1440
    3120 × 1440
    3040 × 1440
    2960 × 1440
    2880 × 1440
    2560 × 1440
    2304 × 1440
    2160 × 1440
    1920 × 1440

  18. Head_Exchange_5329

    Even seen stores selling “2K supported” items. Been pissing me off for years. 1920p is damn closer to 2K than 2560p. Let’s use a little bit of logic to descriptions, it makes it less confusing and annoying. I know it’s a lost battle due to people and their convictions.

  19. unable_To_Username

    Laughts in 1080p with an equal numbered GPU

  20. Tubaenthusiasticbee

    It’s just buzzwording. UHD isn’t 4k either, yet everyone uses 4k, because it sounds fancier.

  21. maewemeetagain

    There are multiple 2K standards, the same way there are multiple 4K standards. If we’re going to be this pedantic about the numbers, then 3840×2160 wouldn’t be considered a 4K resolution standard.

  22. be_azure

    1440p is 1440p, the “k” are for show anyways

Write A Comment