Be funny if this wasn’t binding in the event people used pirated versions of the software.
aForgedPiston
I wonder how the U.S. government, a widespread and heavy user of this software (to include every military computer I’ve ever come across), will think of this
EnvironmentalSet6089
This is most likely language geared for users that create assets to share in Adobe cloud for other users, not entire copyrighted imagery or work. I’m sure a lawyer or business TOS type of person will be here shortly to sort the language out. I believe this TOS language is in all social media already and has been for ages.
BlastMode7
Makes me glad I absolutely refused to buy into their subscription model. Adobe can piss right off.
You get: Crappy software that constantly crashes.
We get: Free license to you your intellectual property for our own use.
CharAznableLoNZ
My copy of CS6.5 still works great and hasn’t had to deal with any of their cloud BS.
ignatiusOfCrayloa
Adobe should be sued for being an anticompetitive illegal monopoly. If only antitrust laws still had teeth.
Real_CatMan
I don’t know how I missed this. I was doing a research project on owning software last week, and Adobe was pretty well scoring, at least to customers who purchased lifetime licenses to a software suite.
CosmicEmotion
The only solution to the problems of the world is Free and Open Source Software.
SpockBauru
I’m using Davinci Resolve for video editing, is a nice replacement from adobe premiere. For drawing Krita is awesome. Also people are saying good things about Affninity suite to replace photo stuff so I think worth take a look.
Apprehensive-Gold852
crazy
slaughter_cats
Adobe seem liike such a terrible company
rienholt
This clause for using their services. You are giving them a license so that their hosting and serving the content is not a violation of copyright. Dropbox, Google, and Microsoft all have similar clauses. This is not to be confused with the disclaimer for submitting to Adobe stock.
sachiel1462
With this wording, could they legally use everything to train an AI that will “improve the service “?
14 Comments
Be funny if this wasn’t binding in the event people used pirated versions of the software.
I wonder how the U.S. government, a widespread and heavy user of this software (to include every military computer I’ve ever come across), will think of this
This is most likely language geared for users that create assets to share in Adobe cloud for other users, not entire copyrighted imagery or work. I’m sure a lawyer or business TOS type of person will be here shortly to sort the language out. I believe this TOS language is in all social media already and has been for ages.
Makes me glad I absolutely refused to buy into their subscription model. Adobe can piss right off.
You get: Crappy software that constantly crashes.
We get: Free license to you your intellectual property for our own use.
My copy of CS6.5 still works great and hasn’t had to deal with any of their cloud BS.
Adobe should be sued for being an anticompetitive illegal monopoly. If only antitrust laws still had teeth.
I don’t know how I missed this. I was doing a research project on owning software last week, and Adobe was pretty well scoring, at least to customers who purchased lifetime licenses to a software suite.
The only solution to the problems of the world is Free and Open Source Software.
I’m using Davinci Resolve for video editing, is a nice replacement from adobe premiere. For drawing Krita is awesome. Also people are saying good things about Affninity suite to replace photo stuff so I think worth take a look.
crazy
Adobe seem liike such a terrible company
This clause for using their services. You are giving them a license so that their hosting and serving the content is not a violation of copyright. Dropbox, Google, and Microsoft all have similar clauses. This is not to be confused with the disclaimer for submitting to Adobe stock.
With this wording, could they legally use everything to train an AI that will “improve the service “?
