Myers is lawful evil, Hansen is neutral evil. Maiko is chaotic evil.
microwavefridge2000
I wouldn’t put Alex as neutral good. Secret agents are not a very nice people.
FlowingThot
You fucking cannot put a CIA agent as neutral good.
No_Tamanegi
Maiko isn’t evil. She’s an asshole, but she’s not evil. She mostly wants to do good, she just wants to do it her way.
Traditional-Ad3518
Johnny belongs another raging terrorist asshole but otherwise not bad
Gear-Noir
Nobody is neutral in Night City and few people are “good” in the traditional sense.
No-Technology-9580
Hands lawful neutral? My man he is a fixer and one who wants to seize control over Dogtown and then the rest of NC on top of it
Disposable_Minion47
Lawful Evil? Maybe Hanako or Myers
StalinkaEnjoyer
D&D alignment doesn’t apply to Cyberpunk, never has, never will.
Supernoven
Vik belongs in the Neutral Good spot
Royal_Nails
I’d put reed instead of Panam for chaotic good.
ManOfSpoons
None of these people are good or lawful, that’s a big point of the game
peppermintvalet
I like Johnny a lot but if his retelling of events is accurate he killed at least 12k mostly innocent people and turned night city into a radioactive zone… that’s not neutral
AdventurousHearing89
Lawful good or neutral good belong to our boy Jackie
Neverwherehere
I’m not sure if anyone could be considered Lawful Good in this setting; Neutral Good is probably the best anyone could hope for.
Speaking of, I can see Vik and Jackie being Neutral Good.
oldladyhater
maybe, for an extremely heavily weighted definition of the words “good” and “evil” all the people pictured here are career criminals, thieves, murderers, and psychopaths, including panam, but except for maybe peralez, who on any other alignment chart would be lawful evil.
OracularOrifice
Saburo Arasaka should get that lawful evil spot. He’s the epitome of it.
cmcg18
Hands and Alex are just flat out wrong lol
Ones a mob boss and the other is a secret agent who executed people
JarlJonsei
Absolutely terrible NGL
Melmacian_Santa
This doesn’t really work with the narrative of the genre IMO.
Zumaakk
My V was neutral evil as fuck!
Ace_Up_Your_Sleeves
I feel like depending on the player, V can be neutral good or lawful neutral,
oroheit
One of the major themes of Cyberpunk is that there are no good guys. You are either morally grey or morally black. For example, Raffen Shiv are morally black, the Aldecaldos are morally grey (they raid corpo convoys but that is still killing lots of people).
Emotional_Relative15
wouldnt put johnny as anything other than evil. His motives may be good, but he’s a cyberpsycho willing to use whatever methods necessary to achieve them. He’s honestly chaotic or neutral evil, anything that doesnt fit in with his worldview gets wiped from the map if its in his way.
I mean dont get me wrong, throughout 2077 i came to like the guy, but i never let the charm distract me from who he was, and he’s not a good guy at all.
sandchigger
Literally nobody you meet in the game is good.
W4steofSpace
The only ones that are right are Panam and smasher.
Alex is evil, maybe lawful but definitely evil, she’s a fucking CIA agent.
Mr Hands is lawful evil, he desires to control all of Dogtown and NC and clearly everything he does is to that end. He even says as much. He does however operate within the “fixer’s code”.
Johnny is chaotic evil, he only starts maybe being chaotic neutral when he fuses with V *and* if you have a good relationship with him at the game’s end.
Vik should be neutral good.
Mr. Blue eyes is either Lawful Evil or Chaotic Neutral, he’s most likely a rogue AI puppeteering a body. He also is literally reprogramming people’s brains as seen with the Peralezes. Now, the theory is that Night Corp, which he is either working with or is in charge of, is an anti corp corp, but by no stretch of the word are they good.
V is chaotic neutral not true neutral. They simply do whatever they want, evil or good, depending on if they feel like it or if they’re getting paid.
Maiko is lawful evil, she operates within the corrupt system and abides by it rules to get what she wants.
Hansen is neutral evil, maybe chaotic evil, but his whole thing is about operating outside pre established systems.
MegaPantera
Jefferson literally asks you to be his security guard so he can raise taxes (if you don’t tell him about what’s actually going on at least) so while he’s definitely lawful, I’d struggle to say he is good (though if not for what was going on behind the scenes I’m sure he would be).
SirPorthos
​
​
​
Lawful good would be Vik or Misty
Both Vik and Misty are traditionally good characters that have their own code they live by. Vik just wants to lay low and spend his time watching beatdowns and Misty lives by whatever lifestyle she espouses in the esoterica.
​
Neutral good would be Judy
Judy is a virtu editor by day and night club revolutionary by night. She initially starts off being all level headed and asking Evelyn not to go with the heist as she foresees doom but the moment she goes missing and gets a hint that she might be at Fingers, she starts showing very antagonistic behavior. Also is the fact that if you leave Woodman alive during your time at Clouds, she joins you in his assassination later after meeting with Maeda, even though it goes against whatever she said to Evelyn about staying safe.
​
Chaotic good would be Jackie
Jackie is a bit a wild card. He has a good heart but while he does have principles he lives by, they are guidelines at best in a lot of cases. During the Nomad and Streetkid intros, Jackie is doing something illegal and during the meetup with Maelstrom, he is quick to anger and start a fight even though both he and V know that the Flathead is crucial for the mission.
me3888
I don’t know about Alex but otherwise it seems good
HavenTheCat
It needs some changes but it’s a good start. Vik as neutral good would be better imo
MaskedMan8
I don’t agree with Smasher. He can’t be considered chaotic if he’s on a leash. He only does what he needs to when he’s ordered to.
teh_201d
I mean I can see how you chose each person… but all of them do murder.
HisNameIsSTARK
How is smasher chaotic? He works for Arasaka and thereby supports its corporate order
No_Truce_
Alignment is trash, and doesn’t belong in Cyberpunk.
All the villains you listed belong in “chaotic evil” none of them demonstrate a code of ethics.
Ultimately survival and exploitation define the dystopia of 2077.
EllieNekoGirl
Panam isn’t good. More neutral. She takes jobs like V and steals from her own clan.
awildmoosey
Hansen certainly isn’t lawful considering he’s in a standoff with the NUSA
Sean_Gause
johnny silverhand, a terrorist involved in the killing of thousands of people: chaotic neutral.
38 Comments
Myers is lawful evil, Hansen is neutral evil. Maiko is chaotic evil.
I wouldn’t put Alex as neutral good. Secret agents are not a very nice people.
You fucking cannot put a CIA agent as neutral good.
Maiko isn’t evil. She’s an asshole, but she’s not evil. She mostly wants to do good, she just wants to do it her way.
Johnny belongs another raging terrorist asshole but otherwise not bad
Nobody is neutral in Night City and few people are “good” in the traditional sense.
Hands lawful neutral? My man he is a fixer and one who wants to seize control over Dogtown and then the rest of NC on top of it
Lawful Evil? Maybe Hanako or Myers
D&D alignment doesn’t apply to Cyberpunk, never has, never will.
Vik belongs in the Neutral Good spot
I’d put reed instead of Panam for chaotic good.
None of these people are good or lawful, that’s a big point of the game
I like Johnny a lot but if his retelling of events is accurate he killed at least 12k mostly innocent people and turned night city into a radioactive zone… that’s not neutral
Lawful good or neutral good belong to our boy Jackie
I’m not sure if anyone could be considered Lawful Good in this setting; Neutral Good is probably the best anyone could hope for.
Speaking of, I can see Vik and Jackie being Neutral Good.
maybe, for an extremely heavily weighted definition of the words “good” and “evil” all the people pictured here are career criminals, thieves, murderers, and psychopaths, including panam, but except for maybe peralez, who on any other alignment chart would be lawful evil.
Saburo Arasaka should get that lawful evil spot. He’s the epitome of it.
Hands and Alex are just flat out wrong lol
Ones a mob boss and the other is a secret agent who executed people
Absolutely terrible NGL
This doesn’t really work with the narrative of the genre IMO.
My V was neutral evil as fuck!
I feel like depending on the player, V can be neutral good or lawful neutral,
One of the major themes of Cyberpunk is that there are no good guys. You are either morally grey or morally black. For example, Raffen Shiv are morally black, the Aldecaldos are morally grey (they raid corpo convoys but that is still killing lots of people).
wouldnt put johnny as anything other than evil. His motives may be good, but he’s a cyberpsycho willing to use whatever methods necessary to achieve them. He’s honestly chaotic or neutral evil, anything that doesnt fit in with his worldview gets wiped from the map if its in his way.
I mean dont get me wrong, throughout 2077 i came to like the guy, but i never let the charm distract me from who he was, and he’s not a good guy at all.
Literally nobody you meet in the game is good.
The only ones that are right are Panam and smasher.
Alex is evil, maybe lawful but definitely evil, she’s a fucking CIA agent.
Mr Hands is lawful evil, he desires to control all of Dogtown and NC and clearly everything he does is to that end. He even says as much. He does however operate within the “fixer’s code”.
Johnny is chaotic evil, he only starts maybe being chaotic neutral when he fuses with V *and* if you have a good relationship with him at the game’s end.
Vik should be neutral good.
Mr. Blue eyes is either Lawful Evil or Chaotic Neutral, he’s most likely a rogue AI puppeteering a body. He also is literally reprogramming people’s brains as seen with the Peralezes. Now, the theory is that Night Corp, which he is either working with or is in charge of, is an anti corp corp, but by no stretch of the word are they good.
V is chaotic neutral not true neutral. They simply do whatever they want, evil or good, depending on if they feel like it or if they’re getting paid.
Maiko is lawful evil, she operates within the corrupt system and abides by it rules to get what she wants.
Hansen is neutral evil, maybe chaotic evil, but his whole thing is about operating outside pre established systems.
Jefferson literally asks you to be his security guard so he can raise taxes (if you don’t tell him about what’s actually going on at least) so while he’s definitely lawful, I’d struggle to say he is good (though if not for what was going on behind the scenes I’m sure he would be).
​
​
​
Lawful good would be Vik or Misty
Both Vik and Misty are traditionally good characters that have their own code they live by. Vik just wants to lay low and spend his time watching beatdowns and Misty lives by whatever lifestyle she espouses in the esoterica.
​
Neutral good would be Judy
Judy is a virtu editor by day and night club revolutionary by night. She initially starts off being all level headed and asking Evelyn not to go with the heist as she foresees doom but the moment she goes missing and gets a hint that she might be at Fingers, she starts showing very antagonistic behavior. Also is the fact that if you leave Woodman alive during your time at Clouds, she joins you in his assassination later after meeting with Maeda, even though it goes against whatever she said to Evelyn about staying safe.
​
Chaotic good would be Jackie
Jackie is a bit a wild card. He has a good heart but while he does have principles he lives by, they are guidelines at best in a lot of cases. During the Nomad and Streetkid intros, Jackie is doing something illegal and during the meetup with Maelstrom, he is quick to anger and start a fight even though both he and V know that the Flathead is crucial for the mission.
I don’t know about Alex but otherwise it seems good
It needs some changes but it’s a good start. Vik as neutral good would be better imo
I don’t agree with Smasher. He can’t be considered chaotic if he’s on a leash. He only does what he needs to when he’s ordered to.
I mean I can see how you chose each person… but all of them do murder.
How is smasher chaotic? He works for Arasaka and thereby supports its corporate order
Alignment is trash, and doesn’t belong in Cyberpunk.
All the villains you listed belong in “chaotic evil” none of them demonstrate a code of ethics.
Ultimately survival and exploitation define the dystopia of 2077.
Panam isn’t good. More neutral. She takes jobs like V and steals from her own clan.
Hansen certainly isn’t lawful considering he’s in a standoff with the NUSA
johnny silverhand, a terrorist involved in the killing of thousands of people: chaotic neutral.
WHERES JUDY!?