I see several solutions. You just need to waste a digit to get started.
QuietMode578
It is resolvable. Start from last BD in the upper row, go to 7A in the second row from the top. After that it’s easy.
skerrpt
you can miss the first guess to get to the solution with the last 6- so start on the top row position 5 BD then restart at the 7A directly under it
erthboy
Start with 2nd BD in first row.
LowShake5456
Select 55 in column 1 row 1 to start,
Down to 7A row 6,
Right to BD column 7,
Up to FF row 4,
Left to 1C column 1,
Down to 55 row row 7,
Right to 7A column 7,
threetimes26
Start with the first BD
-Not_Smart_Enough-
It can theres 8 chances and 6 variables
Covid_19-1
Exit/unplug, then jack back in. It will reset RNG for the puzzle with a chance to be a little less complicated for you.
davislive
You’re stupid
Syun_Wukong
Definitely solvable.
SepticKnave39
Figured it out in 2 tries. It’s definitely solvable. You just have to start on a wrong entry to get to the first right entry. 75% of them are set up that way once you get to the higher level sequences.
Racerchiba
Solved it in my head in about 10 seconds, then did it backwards for fun.
I-AM-A-ROBOT-
i figured it out first try, it is definitely possible
Shujan109
It is solvable. You don’t need to start with 7A. First select 55 then select 7A and you can do all of them now.
SFWxMadHatter
As long as you hit the full sequence in order, you are fine. Anytime you are trying to solve these, you can plan what I call “burners” in between sets. IE: burn a 55 to get into the right column for a 7A to start a needed sequence.
I will literally count on my fucking fingers while plotting my route for these lol.
none of them is unsolvable, need to waste 1 or 2 digits
SRSLY_MANG
This used to annoy me and I actually stumbled across the answer my accident. Usually you just waste the first digit by picking the number that isn’t your first number, BUT will lead you to the first number. It’s super annoying to come across, with zero explanation. I feel yaa.
waste first digit and start from first column
typo edit*
PaleontologistTrue74
Found one solution after wasting a digit. A hand trick is to look for ff 1c connections that can get linked to bd. That one was extremely hard. Where you low on int or dodnt spec hacking ?
JaidenPouichareal
You’ll have to sacrifice 7A to get to the other 7A
39 Comments
If bottom left is 0,0
1,6 to 1,1 to 6,1 to 6,3 to 0,3 to 0,0 to 6,0
I see several solutions. You just need to waste a digit to get started.
It is resolvable. Start from last BD in the upper row, go to 7A in the second row from the top. After that it’s easy.
you can miss the first guess to get to the solution with the last 6- so start on the top row position 5 BD then restart at the 7A directly under it
Start with 2nd BD in first row.
Select 55 in column 1 row 1 to start,
Down to 7A row 6,
Right to BD column 7,
Up to FF row 4,
Left to 1C column 1,
Down to 55 row row 7,
Right to 7A column 7,
Start with the first BD
It can theres 8 chances and 6 variables
Exit/unplug, then jack back in. It will reset RNG for the puzzle with a chance to be a little less complicated for you.
You’re stupid
Definitely solvable.
Figured it out in 2 tries. It’s definitely solvable. You just have to start on a wrong entry to get to the first right entry. 75% of them are set up that way once you get to the higher level sequences.
Solved it in my head in about 10 seconds, then did it backwards for fun.
i figured it out first try, it is definitely possible
It is solvable. You don’t need to start with 7A. First select 55 then select 7A and you can do all of them now.
As long as you hit the full sequence in order, you are fine. Anytime you are trying to solve these, you can plan what I call “burners” in between sets. IE: burn a 55 to get into the right column for a 7A to start a needed sequence.
I will literally count on my fucking fingers while plotting my route for these lol.
Definitely solvable. Just not perfectly solvable.
I normally don’t bother.
Easy
Start at the red, end at the green
https://preview.redd.it/oc6ia3oyy11c1.jpeg?width=1357&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=19d1f3ed97c6c567bfbefc05d326525e862aa19a
solved it on my first try. you don’t need to enter a valid option for the first selection.
https://preview.redd.it/bti0e6yjz11c1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dbd8008aaa83fc07ba27efbb0b5fcdbe17554179
What I found
https://preview.redd.it/ii5a5xqr021c1.png?width=369&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=630e7ddf109cef2e0cc5aa3c90878a6d9fb79174
This is easy
https://preview.redd.it/51de74o4121c1.png?width=3840&format=png&auto=webp&s=e8f383f009db073111249b2ad1a6a116a881c2ce
This… and Yeah… ur stupid!! 😀
Found two solutions, take a second and you’ll find some.
Key is to punt first slot to set up the first digit. If you start thinking you can’t waste a spot, then it is impossible.
It’s doable, did found a path, just start somewhere els, and wast a first number
Yeah it’s easily solvable but if you’re having issues download the [Breacher](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.radix.cyberpunkbreachsolver) app and it’ll find the solutions for you
none of them is unsolvable, need to waste 1 or 2 digits
This used to annoy me and I actually stumbled across the answer my accident. Usually you just waste the first digit by picking the number that isn’t your first number, BUT will lead you to the first number. It’s super annoying to come across, with zero explanation. I feel yaa.
Hahaha you need more intelligence points XD
https://preview.redd.it/mik93ld2g21c1.jpeg?width=1078&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b51102239593d97f808aa728521b47f3b0522539
first one (red) needs to be one to the left tho
waste first digit and start from first column
typo edit*
Found one solution after wasting a digit. A hand trick is to look for ff 1c connections that can get linked to bd. That one was extremely hard. Where you low on int or dodnt spec hacking ?
You’ll have to sacrifice 7A to get to the other 7A
https://preview.redd.it/q2nqv2j3j21c1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cfa039c71da7ab536c5bbef81da878a1e5fbf999
Comment 51 reiterating that yes, this can be completed.
The real question is why do you only have 6 seconds to solve it?? I thought the minimum was around 24 seconds. Is this what 3 INT looks like???
Btw 6 seconds, I thought you get a lot more time
You stoopid