Am i stupid or is this unsolvable?

39 Comments

  1. MW_Daught

    If bottom left is 0,0

    1,6 to 1,1 to 6,1 to 6,3 to 0,3 to 0,0 to 6,0

  2. Danialla

    I see several solutions. You just need to waste a digit to get started.

  3. QuietMode578

    It is resolvable. Start from last BD in the upper row, go to 7A in the second row from the top. After that it’s easy.

  4. you can miss the first guess to get to the solution with the last 6- so start on the top row position 5 BD then restart at the 7A directly under it

  5. LowShake5456

    Select 55 in column 1 row 1 to start,
    Down to 7A row 6,
    Right to BD column 7,
    Up to FF row 4,
    Left to 1C column 1,
    Down to 55 row row 7,
    Right to 7A column 7,

  6. -Not_Smart_Enough-

    It can theres 8 chances and 6 variables

  7. Covid_19-1

    Exit/unplug, then jack back in. It will reset RNG for the puzzle with a chance to be a little less complicated for you.

  8. SepticKnave39

    Figured it out in 2 tries. It’s definitely solvable. You just have to start on a wrong entry to get to the first right entry. 75% of them are set up that way once you get to the higher level sequences.

  9. Racerchiba

    Solved it in my head in about 10 seconds, then did it backwards for fun.

  10. I-AM-A-ROBOT-

    i figured it out first try, it is definitely possible

  11. Shujan109

    It is solvable. You don’t need to start with 7A. First select 55 then select 7A and you can do all of them now.

  12. SFWxMadHatter

    As long as you hit the full sequence in order, you are fine. Anytime you are trying to solve these, you can plan what I call “burners” in between sets. IE: burn a 55 to get into the right column for a 7A to start a needed sequence.

    I will literally count on my fucking fingers while plotting my route for these lol.

  13. Striking-Version1233

    Definitely solvable. Just not perfectly solvable.

  14. starfruit_enjoyer

    solved it on my first try. you don’t need to enter a valid option for the first selection.

  15. Greatest-Comrade

    Found two solutions, take a second and you’ll find some.

    Key is to punt first slot to set up the first digit. If you start thinking you can’t waste a spot, then it is impossible.

  16. Ralvuimago

    It’s doable, did found a path, just start somewhere els, and wast a first number

  17. sendu666

    none of them is unsolvable, need to waste 1 or 2 digits

  18. SRSLY_MANG

    This used to annoy me and I actually stumbled across the answer my accident. Usually you just waste the first digit by picking the number that isn’t your first number, BUT will lead you to the first number. It’s super annoying to come across, with zero explanation. I feel yaa.

  19. fancykill

    Hahaha you need more intelligence points XD

  20. East_Property

    waste first digit and start from first column
    typo edit*

  21. PaleontologistTrue74

    Found one solution after wasting a digit. A hand trick is to look for ff 1c connections that can get linked to bd. That one was extremely hard. Where you low on int or dodnt spec hacking ?

  22. MuddVader

    Comment 51 reiterating that yes, this can be completed.

  23. Nymeros2077

    The real question is why do you only have 6 seconds to solve it?? I thought the minimum was around 24 seconds. Is this what 3 INT looks like???

  24. cupcake_queen101

    Btw 6 seconds, I thought you get a lot more time

Write A Comment