Stuff like this is probably part of why the performance is so bad. All the models and textures of random objects in the world are more detailed than they need to be.
Kulaoudo
Starfield one looks softer
SignalButterscotch73
I know it’s a joke here but I bet some people actually think this comparison is valid.
3 years apart… game originally developed with last gen in mind vs game developed with current gen in mind.
Of bloody course it looks better, we’d be pissed off if Starfield looked the same as such an old game.
Edit. I think people are misunderstanding. I’m not saying that Starfield looks better than Cyberpunk 2077, I’m saying the bloody sandwich looks better and it should because it’s a more recent game designed for more powerful hardware so they could afford to use more geometry in the 3D models and higher resolution textures.
Cyberpunk has better lighting and a colour palette I like more. Both of which make it a better looking game overall in my opinion. Hell, NOLF2 looks better than a lot of modern games in my opinion and it’s 20+ years old.
szponix
Thank god Bethesda focused on one thing that really matter in a game and not story, characters, quests and exploration.
Titanium_Eye
I’ll get downvoted to oblivion, but on the right is a heavily modded Morrowind engine.
TruthOrSF
Can we talk about how weird it is that food gets so much attention in games these days?
KnightofAshley
Final Fantasy does food better
StolzHound
But have you watched the NPCs eat in Starfield? That’s embarrassing.
Randomtxtbox
SAMMICH
zeus1911
The npcs can eat the food in cyberpunk and in multiple phases, not just gone instantly.
Almun_Elpuliyn
I despise how we started to value the texture of food more than gameplay and story.
Zephyrius013
congratz shitfield got the one thing right that won’t fix the dead game
Vulcanicloud
If only everything else about Bethesda titles was modernized and polished.
This is exactly what we made fun of console fanboys of, where they compare the peach fuzz on character models, or like here, stupid ass sandwich graphics.
Because minute, tiny details are far more important over actual gameplay, monetization, performance.
Starfield does have very good material design. Things are pretty well-blended with everything while in CP some things are amazing and other things are.. Gothic 2 level
lmao anyone coming in using starfield as a better game vs anything at all just hasnt played starfield OR just hasnt actually played any other game at all themselves.
I have more fun in hexen 2 than I do in starfield.
supershaggy3113
How does sandwich graphics make a difference? cp2077 is leagues better than starfield
JOBI32
Now take a look at the combat systems in both games
Caasi72
This makes no goddamn sense at all
DoctahDonkey
Not gonna lie, I’d much rather play the launch version of Cyberpunk than any current version of Starfield.
HellScratchy
The first one is a fully enjoyable game that wasnt built on over 20 year old engine that has the same bugs, that the devs will just leave there for community to fix for the 4th time in a row…
We know how to fix those, we did it to Skyrim, to Oblivion, to Morrowind, FO4,… yet Bethesda are just so inept to fix them for their next games… Also… use something better, Bethesda…
​
And yes, CP77 has so much better gameplay loop imo.
Played over 137 hours on CP77, could not finish even 5 hours in Starfield…. says a lot.
​
And dont get me wrong… i bought Star Citizen a week ago and still enjoy it, so its not the theme or pace or smt…
ImFromDaBurghNat
One I’ve played through 3 times and 1 I struggled to finish once. Take a guess
Euphoric_Dot_8294
And neither actually show you eating the sandwich progressingly like in Red Dead?
What’s the point of this post? They both didn’t put any effort into progressional animation.
CantHelpTheFact
A shit sandwich still a shit sandwich.
SamR1301
I mean….the game isnt a sandwich simulator. Idk how it looks if it doesnt play well. 4k ultrarealistic graphics don’t mean shit if the game isn’t fun.
34 Comments
Stuff like this is probably part of why the performance is so bad. All the models and textures of random objects in the world are more detailed than they need to be.
Starfield one looks softer
I know it’s a joke here but I bet some people actually think this comparison is valid.
3 years apart… game originally developed with last gen in mind vs game developed with current gen in mind.
Of bloody course it looks better, we’d be pissed off if Starfield looked the same as such an old game.
Edit. I think people are misunderstanding. I’m not saying that Starfield looks better than Cyberpunk 2077, I’m saying the bloody sandwich looks better and it should because it’s a more recent game designed for more powerful hardware so they could afford to use more geometry in the 3D models and higher resolution textures.
Cyberpunk has better lighting and a colour palette I like more. Both of which make it a better looking game overall in my opinion. Hell, NOLF2 looks better than a lot of modern games in my opinion and it’s 20+ years old.
Thank god Bethesda focused on one thing that really matter in a game and not story, characters, quests and exploration.
I’ll get downvoted to oblivion, but on the right is a heavily modded Morrowind engine.
Can we talk about how weird it is that food gets so much attention in games these days?
Final Fantasy does food better
But have you watched the NPCs eat in Starfield? That’s embarrassing.
SAMMICH
The npcs can eat the food in cyberpunk and in multiple phases, not just gone instantly.
I despise how we started to value the texture of food more than gameplay and story.
congratz shitfield got the one thing right that won’t fix the dead game
If only everything else about Bethesda titles was modernized and polished.
This is exactly what we made fun of console fanboys of, where they compare the peach fuzz on character models, or like here, stupid ass sandwich graphics.
Because minute, tiny details are far more important over actual gameplay, monetization, performance.
Now compare faces
https://preview.redd.it/782pn9c670zb1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=30c8ca876c663821d27f798c8a6580fd48f5aa26
I wonder how many loading screens you would have to go through, to reach the sandwich on starfield though.
Sorry, peasants, [but this is the best cooking in gaming history](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqAfXQCItMA).
Rage bait.
Starfield does have very good material design. Things are pretty well-blended with everything while in CP some things are amazing and other things are.. Gothic 2 level
oh wow look a good sandwich in a bad game.
Drinks in Star Citizen and it’s still in Alpha…
https://preview.redd.it/0jpeajieg0zb1.jpeg?width=1024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5cafe3e037ce2b62cfed21fef1ea13d7c8593275
I love when the background props eat 5 fps each.
Found Todd’s burner account
Reddit users comprehend obvious satire challenge (impossible)
More like Starfield at lunch.
lmao anyone coming in using starfield as a better game vs anything at all just hasnt played starfield OR just hasnt actually played any other game at all themselves.
I have more fun in hexen 2 than I do in starfield.
How does sandwich graphics make a difference? cp2077 is leagues better than starfield
Now take a look at the combat systems in both games
This makes no goddamn sense at all
Not gonna lie, I’d much rather play the launch version of Cyberpunk than any current version of Starfield.
The first one is a fully enjoyable game that wasnt built on over 20 year old engine that has the same bugs, that the devs will just leave there for community to fix for the 4th time in a row…
We know how to fix those, we did it to Skyrim, to Oblivion, to Morrowind, FO4,… yet Bethesda are just so inept to fix them for their next games… Also… use something better, Bethesda…
​
And yes, CP77 has so much better gameplay loop imo.
Played over 137 hours on CP77, could not finish even 5 hours in Starfield…. says a lot.
​
And dont get me wrong… i bought Star Citizen a week ago and still enjoy it, so its not the theme or pace or smt…
One I’ve played through 3 times and 1 I struggled to finish once. Take a guess
And neither actually show you eating the sandwich progressingly like in Red Dead?
What’s the point of this post? They both didn’t put any effort into progressional animation.
A shit sandwich still a shit sandwich.
I mean….the game isnt a sandwich simulator. Idk how it looks if it doesnt play well. 4k ultrarealistic graphics don’t mean shit if the game isn’t fun.