Had to fresh install windows today so heres a Stock vs OC comparison where your CPU/Ram heavily matter. this also shows just how much performance you might be ignoring by going stock only.
Had to fresh install windows today so heres a Stock vs OC comparison where your CPU/Ram heavily matter. this also shows just how much performance you might be ignoring by going stock only.
1 Comment
Great result.
I want to add something interesting.
With kind, FYI. I wonder if it’s possible with Tomb Raider, but I don’t have this game.
Some insights & research about Superposition Benchmark.
My test in [Aida64&ZenTimings](https://imgur.com/a/nhoFwdr)
All test were done with High priority with different number of threads.
[Superposition test, affinity – 24 threads](https://imgur.com/a/i2CJGuq) – 39684 points. Default scenario, barely can touch 40K.
[Superposition test, affinity – 12 threads](https://imgur.com/a/zJyNiDl) – 45756 points. This is not a typical scenario, but almost the best result at a given processor frequency.
[Superposition test, affinity – 10 threads](https://imgur.com/a/UGi9IkV) – 45805 points (best score).
[Superposition test, affinity – 9 threads](https://imgur.com/a/peg6Px7) – 45685 points. The best result with the least number of threads.
[Superposition test, affinity – 8 threads](https://imgur.com/a/qoDz4Aw) – 45378 points. It seems to be a high result, but it has a lot of friezes and a low FPS min.
My conclusion: the test does not like a large number of cores, showing excellent results already on 5 cores. A similar situation is observed at lower frequencies, 8 threads are not enough, but 9 are already smooth. It may seem strange, but it seems that this is the specifics of the test (its load distribution algorithm), so more than 12 threads do not give any improvement in FPS, the border of the memory performance comes earlier.
That was my desire to share information for your conclusions.