Tested stable at 0.7V 1770MHz (88W in Time Spy, Graphics Score \~15600) and 0.85V 2340MHz (133W in Time Spy, Graphics Score \~19600). Image shows the best overclock. Just wondering how this silicon quality stacks up against other AD104 frequency-wise (like the 4070, 4070 super, and 4070 ti desktop.)
My laptop seemed to be configured with only 8 PCIe 4.0 lanes to the GPU, so this could hold back my Time Spy score. This image is when I tested it at the full 175W.
[The CPU is limited to lower frequency in order avoid power allocation issues](https://preview.redd.it/op1df06tlbmc1.png?width=2559&format=png&auto=webp&s=95c05d093db16077cb62124889aaf1ca5481e0d0)
I asked a few AMD users ranging from ROG Strix Scar 17 to Alienware M16 R1, and apparently they are all stuck with 8 PCIe lanes for the GPU, no matter if it is a 4080 Laptop or a 4090 Laptop.
The link to this run: [NVIDIA RTX 4080 (notebook) video card benchmark result – AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX,ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. G733PZ (3dmark.com)](https://www.3dmark.com/spy/43593287)